ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024
US Medicaid program: An analysis of the spending and utilization patterns for antidepressants from 2017 to 2021.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibition of the serotonin transporter and risk of heart valve disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Cortisol levels and depression suicide risk: a combined exploration of meta-analysis and case-control study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Factors Facilitating Adoption of Pharmacogenetic Testing by Prescribers of Antidepressants in Four US Health Systems: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional PGx Implementation Science Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Trazodone effectiveness in depression (TED): a comparative evaluation of effect sizes trazodone extended release and SSRIs in the treatment of major depressive disorder.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Holistic Management of Adult ADHD with a History of Addiction: Emphasis on Low-Addiction-Risk Psychopharmacotherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- International Trends in Antidepressant Consumption: a 10-year Comparative Analysis (2010-2020).The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Observational
- Understanding social media discourse on antidepressants: unsupervised and sentiment analysis using X.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Role of the Blood-Brain Barrier in the Pathophysiology of Depression: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious mental health condition that contributes to health complications, financial burden and death. In 2020, about one in five US adults had a lifetime diagnosis of MDD Objective: The study investigated antidepressant usage and market distribution in the Medicaid Program. By doing so, the study aimed to provide insights into how these trends reflect broader changes in mental health treatment practices and policy implications within the Medicaid system during the study period. Methods: Public Medicaid data from 2017 to 2021 were analyzed, focusing on 30 FDA-approved antidepressants. Spending and prescription data were aggregated using Excel and Python. Results: The total US Medicaid expenditure on antidepressants increased from about $1 billion dollars in 2017 to $1.12 billion dollars in 2021, an increase of about 10%. Consistently, SSRIs were the class of antidepressants that Medicaid spent the most on. The highest Medicaid spending on a single antidepressant in 2017 and 2018 was bupropion. During the remaining years of the study (2019, 2020, 2021) Medicaid appropriated most funds toward Vortioxetine. The total number of antidepressant prescriptions increased from 52 million scripts to 59 million scripts (an increase of about 14%). Conclusions: The increase in Medicaid spending on antidepressants during the study period can be explained by an increase in utilization (a 14% increase in antidepressant prescriptions from 2017 to 2021), and a shift toward prescribing newer more costly antidepressants (like SSRIs and others) and away from prescribing older, less costly antidepressants like monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.