ArticleTobacco induced diseases2023
Sex differences in the association between smoking and central sensitization: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between lifestyle habits and central sensitization in community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a cross-sectional analysis from the Otassha study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Influence of smoking and socioeconomic status on labor analgesia: a nationwide register-based study in Finland.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the acknowledged interconnection between smoking and pain, research on the relationship between smoking and central sensitization (CS) is scarce; this pain mechanism has attracted recent research attention. Considering potential sex differences, this cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between smoking and CS.
methodsOverall, 415 adult participants from an outpatient clinic underwent evaluation. The analysis focused on determining the relationship between smoking status and CS by differentiating between sexes. Data were collected on smoking presence or absence (independent variable) and CS (dependent variable) for each sex, with age, education level, drinking history, depression, and anxiety as covariates. CS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory. Following a descriptive analysis of the study population's characteristics, logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the relationships.
resultsThe average participant age was 42.3 years, with 59% being women. Among women, a significant association was found between smoking status and higher CS severity (AOR=3.21; 95% CI 1.29-7.99, p<0.01), after accounting for confounding variables. Conversely, no significant association was observed for men (AOR=1.50; 95% CI 0.63-3.60, p=0.36). Interaction by sex on the relationship between smoking and CS was not statistically significant (p=0.23).
conclusionsThis study suggests a potential association between smoking and CS in women, whereas no conclusive relationship was observed among men. These findings indicate the necessity of considering CS when examining the relationship between smoking and pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.