ArticleBlood cell therapy2023
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Acute Leukemia.
Article in Blood cell therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rheumatologists' expectations and perceptions of T-cell redirecting therapies: results from a cross-sectional survey.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- The Immune Resistance Signature of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Current Immunotherapy Strategies.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The worldwide use of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells has increased the response rate in patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clinical practice has become much safer with the help of immunotherapy-related toxicity management guidelines, such as the ASTCT consensus grading system. Tocilizumab and steroids are the major interventions for controlling cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). New drugs and interventions for uncontrolled CRS and ICANS, including JAK1/2 inhibitors, have also been investigated. The combination of ruxolitinib and steroids effectively controlled severe CRS without impeding CAR-T cell expansion. Patients with refractory CNS3 status and CNS masses were excluded from the clinical trials because of the high risk of severe ICANS. Intracranial injections of steroids and Ommaya capsule implantation were effective. For some heavily treated patients, the difficulties in CAR-T cell manufacturing and expansion may be resolved by combination with blinatumumab. Relapse is a major concern after CAR-T therapy, and combination interventions, such as allogeneic stem cell transplantation, dual-target CAR-T cell therapies, and sequential CD19/22 CAR-T infusion, have been investigated in many centers. For T-lineage-targeted CAR-T therapies, the CAR T-cell fratricide can be overcome using many techniques. The efficacy and safety of CD7+ CAR-T cell therapy have been widely reported in recent years. A high response rate can be achieved when the immune reconstitution is prolonged. Infections, particularly viral reactivations, should be carefully monitored, as relapses are another potential issue. Switching targets and eliminating residual CD7+ CAR-T cells in the blood are key points for patients who relapse after CD7+ CAR-T cell therapy. CAR-T cell therapies for AML have not been investigated in a large-scale cohort, except for CD19-positive AML with the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.