Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148848›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2023

Interplay of Adsorption Geometry and Work Function Evolution at the TCNE/Cu(111) Interface.

Max Niederreiter, Johannes Cartus, Anna Werkovits, Oliver T Hofmann, Thomas Risse, Martin Sterrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structure Prediction of Organic/Inorganic Interfaces with Genarris.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  3. Kinetic Trapping of Charge-Transfer Molecules at Metal Interfaces.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Max NiederreiterInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2462-7514
Johannes CartusInstitute of Solid State Physics, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, Petersgasse, 16/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Anna WerkovitsInstitute of Solid State Physics, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, Petersgasse, 16/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5611-5208
Oliver T HofmannInstitute of Solid State Physics, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, Petersgasse, 16/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2120-3259
Thomas RisseInstitute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Arminallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0228-9189
Martin SterrerInstitute of Physics, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-9061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adsorption of organic electron acceptors on metal surfaces is a powerful way to change the effective work function of the substrate through the formation of charge-transfer-induced dipoles. The work function of the interfaces is hence controlled by the redistribution of charges upon adsorption of the organic layer, which depends not only on the electron affinity of the organic material but also on the adsorption geometry. As shown in this work, the latter dependence controls the work function also in the case of adsorbate layers exhibiting a mixture of various adsorption geometries. Based on a combined experimental (core-level and infrared spectroscopy) and theoretical (density functional theory) study for tetracyanoethylene (TCNE) on Cu(111), we find that TCNE adsorbs in at least three different orientations, depending on TCNE coverage. At low coverage, flat lying TCNE dominates, as it possesses the highest adsorption energy. At a higher coverage, additionally, two different standing orientations are found. This is accompanied by a large increase in the work function of almost 3 eV at full monolayer coverage. Our results suggest that the large increase in work function is mainly due to the surface dipole of the free CN groups of the standing molecules and less dependent on the charge-transfer dipole of the differently oriented and charged molecules. This, in turn, opens new opportunities to control the work function of interfaces, e.g., by synthetic modification of the adsorbates, which may allow one to alter the adsorption geometries of the molecules as well as their contributions to the interface dipoles and, hence, the work function.

Identifiers

PMID38148848
PMCPMC10749461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.