Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148835›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2024

Multiple Sclerosis and Family Planning: A Survey Study of the Patient Experience.

Erin E Kelly, Casey Engel, Rylan Pearsall, J Nicholas Brenton, Riley Bove, Unsong Oh, Myla D Goldman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin E KellyVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7272-5411
Casey EngelVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-1565
Rylan PearsallVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9897-8627
J Nicholas BrentonVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-1347
Riley BoveVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-8800
Unsong OhVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-5299
Myla D GoldmanVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine (EEK), Richmond; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (CE), Roanoke; College of Arts and Sciences (RP); Division of Child Neurology (JNB), Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences (RB), University of California San Francisco; and Virginia Commonwealth University (UO, MDG).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5675-945X
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly affects women in their childbearing years, necessitating discussion between patients and their MS treatment team around the issues of family planning, pregnancy, and postpartum experiences. This study assessed the impact of a diagnosis of MS on women's reproductive decision-making and on their perception of counseling received surrounding pregnancy. It also sought to evaluate trends in pregnancy and postpartum experiences and determine whether experiences differed by race, ethnicity, and zip code. Methods: Women with an MS diagnosis seen at the University of Virginia MS Clinic or at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) MS Clinic were invited to participate in a survey study. MS disease and pregnancy history, and, when appropriate, reasons for pregnancy avoidance were collected. Respondents who had >1 pregnancy following MS diagnosis were asked to evaluate the counseling they received from medical professionals and to share their pregnancy experiences including complications during pregnancy, delivery outcomes, and postpartum experience including breastfeeding. Results: Of the 280 respondents, 76.6% were currently receiving MS specialty care. Most of them (79.3%) had not been pregnant following MS diagnosis. Of them, 20.1% indicated that this decision was driven by MS-related concerns: MS worsening with pregnancy (47%); ability to care for child secondary to MS (35%); passing MS onto child (19%); stopping disease-modifying therapies to attempt pregnancy (14%); lack of knowledge about options for pregnancy and MS (9%). Women with a more recent estimated decade of pregnancy were more likely to report neurologist counseling regarding MS and pregnancy (pregnancy before 2000: 40%, 2000-2010: 64.7%, 2010- present: 83.3%; χ Discussion: Over the past few decades, women with MS have received a wide range of evolving guidance surrounding family planning, pregnancy, and postpartum care. Survey data suggest improvements in MS/pregnancy counseling and medical management in recent years, which may be driven by an increase in research in the field. There remains an important need and opportunity to improve counseling of women with MS who are considering pregnancy.

Identifiers

PMID38148835
PMCPMC10751018
OpenAlexW4390122622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.