ArticleHeliyon2024
Utility of four machine learning approaches for identifying ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aimed at Subtype Discrimination but Yielding a Shared Marker: Integrative Analysis of Blood Transcriptomes Reveals UpregulatedClinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence use for precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
- Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosis: A Machine Learning and Nomogram-Based Approach.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Machine learning in the differential diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a systematic review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of disulfidptosis-related genes reveals the effect of disulfidptosis in ulcerative colitis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning in predicting treatment response and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Peripheral blood routine parameters (PBRPs) are simple and easily acquired markers to identify ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) and reveal the severity, whereas the diagnostic performance of individual PBRP is limited. We, therefore used four machine learning (ML) models to evaluate the diagnostic and predictive values of PBRPs for UC and CD. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted by collecting the PBRPs of 414 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, 423 healthy controls (HCs), and 344 non-IBD intestinal diseases (non-IBD) patients. We used approximately 70 % of the PBRPs data from both patients and HCs for training, 30 % for testing, and another group for external verification. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnosis and prediction performance of these four ML models. Results: Multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network model (MLP-ANN) yielded the highest diagnostic performance than the other three models in six subgroups in the training set, which is helpful for discriminating IBD and HCs, UC and CD, active CD and remissive CD, active UC and remissive UC, non-IBD and HCs, and IBD and non-IBD with the AUC of 1.00, 0.988, 0.942, 1.00, 0.986, and 0.97 in the testing set, as well as the AUC of 1.00, 1.00, 0.773, 0.904, 1.00 and 0.992 in the external validation set. Conclusion: PBRPs-based MLP-ANN model exhibited good performance in discriminating between UC and CD and revealing the disease activity; however, a larger sample size and more models need to be considered for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.