ArticleHeliyon2024
Metagenomic next generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage samples for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lower Respiratory Microbiome Dysbiosis Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Acute Severe Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.MedComm · 2026Article
- Interpreting combined BALF-galactomannan and next-generation sequencing in pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis: a two-center clinical decision framework.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Meta-Analysis of Long-Read and Short-Read Sequencing for Metagenomic Profiling of the Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pathogen detection and diagnostic efficiency of acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Diagnostic Potential: A Comprehensive Review of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Interstitial Lung Disease.Cureus · 2024Review
- Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and lung biopsy tissue metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI)are known to be diagnosed late or inaccurately. This has fueled the unscrupulous use of antibiotics, as they are often used empirically and clinically, leading to antibiotic abuse and multidrug resistance in patients. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), now widely used in clinical studies, could be a potential intervention to revolutionize microbiology by rapidly identifying unknown species. Methods: This review and meta-analysis were conducted on eligible studies with respect to metagenomic sequencing on clinical LRTI diagnostics up to May 01, 2022. QUADAS-2 was employed to assess the methodological bias as well as applicability. After that, a meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the accuracy of mNGS, compared with the composite reference standard (CRS), among the enrolled studies. Results: This work collected 1248 samples in 13/21 qualified articles to factor in the accuracy of the diagnostic test. Typically, methods like molecular testing, culture, composite measures, and clinical decision-making were adopted as the reference criteria. With regard to Bronchoalveolar Lavage Samples, their sensitivity was 89% (82-93%) while their specificity was 90% (66-98%), with obvious heterogeneities in these two factors as demonstrated by different studies. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was plotted for mNGS as a function of LRTI, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.94. A Funnel plot with a p-value greater than 0.05 indicated the absence of publication bias. Positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR) were >10 and > 0.1, respectively. In this pre-test probability-post-probability-likelihood ratio relationship graph, the values were Prior prob (%) = 20, Post-prob-Pos (%) = 77 and Post-prob-Neg (%) = 4. Conclusion: The AUC value of SROC suggested a high accuracy of mNGS in diagnosis, with no publication bias and high reliability. The application of mNGS exhibits notable diagnostic efficacy in discerning pathogens present in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) among patients afflicted with LRTI. However, mNGS is more meaningful for the definitive diagnosis of the disease rather than the exclusion of the disease. This post-test probability is significantly higher than the pre-test probability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.