Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148772›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023

Emerging and Fastidious Uropathogens Were Detected by M-PCR with Similar Prevalence and Cell Density in Catheter and Midstream Voided Urine Indicating the Importance of These Microbes in Causing UTIs.

Dakun Wang, Emery Haley, Natalie Luke, Mohit Mathur, Richard A Festa, Xinhua Zhao, Lori A Anderson, Jennifer L Allison, Kristen L Stebbins, Manuel Jose Diaz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. IDCases · 2024
    Article
  8. Emerging pathogensFuture microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dakun WangDepartment of Writing, Stat4Ward, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Emery HaleyDepartment of Clinical Research, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4497-7601
Natalie LukeDepartment of Clinical Research, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0732-3622
Mohit MathurDepartment of Medical Affairs, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Richard A FestaDepartment of Medical Affairs, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Xinhua ZhaoDepartment of Statistical Analysis, Stat4Ward, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lori A AndersonL. Anderson Diagnostic Market Access Consulting, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jennifer L AllisonDispatchHealth, Denver, CO, USA.
Kristen L StebbinsDispatchHealth, Denver, CO, USA.
Manuel Jose DiazDispatchHealth, Denver, CO, USA.
David BaunochPathnostics, Irvine, CA, 92618, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study compared microbial compositions of midstream and catheter urine specimens from patients with suspected complicated urinary tract infections to determine if emerging and fastidious uropathogens are infecting the bladder or are contaminants. Methods: Urine was collected by in-and-out catheter (n = 1000) or midstream voiding (n = 1000) from 2000 adult patients (≥60 years of age) at 17 DispatchHealth sites across 11 states. The two groups were matched by age (mean 81 years), sex (62.1% female, 37.9% male), and ICD-10-CM codes. Microbial detection was performed with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) with a threshold for "positive detection" ≥ 10,000 cells/mL for bacteria or any detection for yeast. Results were divided by sex. Results: In females, 28 of 30 microorganisms/groups were found by both collection methods, while in males 26 of 30 were found by both. There were significant overlaps in the detection and densities of classical uropathogens including Discussion: In-and-out catheter-collected and midstream voided urine specimens shared significant similarities in microbial detections by M-PCR, with some differences found for a small subset of organisms and between sexes. Conclusion: Non-invasive midstream voided collection of urine specimens for microbial detection and identification in cases of presumed UTI does not result in significantly more contamination compared to in-and-out catheter-collected specimens. Additionally, organisms long regarded as contaminants should be reconsidered as potential uropathogens.

Indexed as

catheterdiagnostic testingmidstream voidedmultiplex polymerase chain reactionstandard urine cultureurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID38148772
PMCPMC10750486
OpenAlexW4390110755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.