Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148766›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

The Dissection of Nitrogen Response Traits Using Drone Phenotyping and Dynamic Phenotypic Analysis to Explore N Responsiveness and Associated Genetic Loci in Wheat.

Guohui Ding, Liyan Shen, Jie Dai, Robert Jackson, Shuchen Liu, Mujahid Ali, Li Sun, Mingxing Wen, Jin Xiao, Greg Deakin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Guohui DingCollege of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-6838
Liyan ShenCollege of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-2914
Jie DaiCollege of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-576X
Robert JacksonCambridge Crop Research, National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8364-1633
Shuchen LiuCollege of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3218-4473
Mujahid AliCollege of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9239-5705
Li SunState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Cytogenetics Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University/JCIC-MCP, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3718-163X
Mingxing WenZhenjiang Institute of Agricultural Science, Jurong, Jiangsu 212400, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2917-2290
Jin XiaoState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Cytogenetics Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University/JCIC-MCP, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-3627
Greg DeakinCambridge Crop Research, National Institute of Agricultural Botany (NIAB), Cambridge CB3 0LE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-345X
Dong JiangRegional Technique Innovation Center for Wheat Production, Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-5043
Xiu-E WangState Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Cytogenetics Institute, Nanjing Agricultural University/JCIC-MCP, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6312-3417
Ji ZhouCollege of Agriculture, Plant Phenomics Research Centre, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5752-5524
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNNational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBHeilongjiang Provincial Environmental Science Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inefficient nitrogen (N) utilization in agricultural production has led to many negative impacts such as excessive use of N fertilizers, redundant plant growth, greenhouse gases, long-lasting toxicity in ecosystem, and even effect on human health, indicating the importance to optimize N applications in cropping systems. Here, we present a multiseasonal study that focused on measuring phenotypic changes in wheat plants when they were responding to different N treatments under field conditions. Powered by drone-based aerial phenotyping and the AirMeasurer platform, we first quantified 6 N response-related traits as targets using plot-based morphological, spectral, and textural signals collected from 54 winter wheat varieties. Then, we developed dynamic phenotypic analysis using curve fitting to establish profile curves of the traits during the season, which enabled us to compute static phenotypes at key growth stages and dynamic phenotypes (i.e., phenotypic changes) during N response. After that, we combine 12 yield production and N-utilization indices manually measured to produce N efficiency comprehensive scores (NECS), based on which we classified the varieties into 4 N responsiveness (i.e., N-dependent yield increase) groups. The NECS ranking facilitated us to establish a tailored machine learning model for N responsiveness-related varietal classification just using N-response phenotypes with high accuracies. Finally, we employed the Wheat55K SNP Array to map single-nucleotide polymorphisms using N response-related static and dynamic phenotypes, helping us explore genetic components underlying N responsiveness in wheat. In summary, we believe that our work demonstrates valuable advances in N response-related plant research, which could have major implications for improving N sustainability in wheat breeding and production.

Identifiers

PMID38148766
PMCPMC10750832
OpenAlexW4389192541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.