Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148689›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2024

Categorization of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Using Lipid Layer Thickness and Meibomian Gland Dropout in Dry Eye Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Phil Kyu Lee, Jae Lim Chung, Da Ran Kim, Young Chae Yoon, SoonWon Yang, Woong-Joo Whang, Yong-Soo Byun, HyungBin Hwang, Kyung Sun Na, HyunSoo Lee and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Phil Kyu LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Lim ChungEyejun Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
Da Ran KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Young Chae YoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
SoonWon YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Woong-Joo WhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Yong-Soo ByunDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
HyungBin HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Sun NaDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
HyunSoo LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
So Hyang ChungDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Chul KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
YangKyung ChoDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun Seung KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Sik HwangDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Catholic University of Korea · KROnnuri Smile Eye Clinic · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Education 2017R1A1A2A10000681Ministry of Education 2020R1A2C1005009Ministry of Health and Welfare HI17C0659National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the present study, we determined the prevalence of obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), hyposecretory MGD, grossly normal MG, and hypersecretory MGD in patients with dry eye syndrome using lipid layer thickness (LLT) and MG dropout.

methodsEighty-eight patients with dry eye syndrome were included in the study. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the LLT and weighted total meiboscore. The proportion of patients in each group was calculated. The age, sex, Ocular Surface Disease Index, LLT, Schirmer, tear film breakup time, cornea stain, weighted total meiboscore, expressibility, and quality of meibum were compared between the four groups.

resultsFifteen eyes (17.0%) had obstructive MGD, two eyes (2.3%) had hyposecretory MGD, 40 eyes (45.5%) had grossly normal MG, and 17 eyes (19.3%) had hypersecretory MGD. The obstructive MGD group was younger than the grossly normal MG group. In obstructive MGD, the ratio of men to women was higher than that of the other groups. However, Ocular Surface Disease Index, Schirmer, tear film breakup time, and corneal stain did not show statistically significant differences between the four groups. The meibum expressibility of the hyposecretoy MGD group was worse than those of the other groups. The meibum expressibility of the hyposecretoy MGD group was poor than those of the obstructive and hypersecretory MGD group.

conclusionsThis categorization was expected to help determine the best treatment method for dry eye syndrome, according to the MG status.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesMeibomian Gland DysfunctionFemaleHumansLipidsMaleMeibomian GlandsRetrospective StudiesTearsLipidsDropoutLipid layer thicknessLipiViewMeibographyMeibomian gland dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID38148689
PMCPMC10869428
OpenAlexW4390270079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.