Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148640›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2023

The molecular classification of cancer-associated fibroblasts on a pan-cancer single-cell transcriptional atlas.

Bonan Chen, Wai Nok Chan, Fuda Xie, Chun Wai Mui, Xiaoli Liu, Alvin H K Cheung, Raymond W M Lung, Chit Chow, Zhenhua Zhang, Canbin Fang and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SDC1Gut · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Bonan ChenDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2430-7934
Wai Nok ChanDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Fuda XieDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chun Wai MuiDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xiaoli LiuDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Alvin H K CheungDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Raymond W M LungDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chit ChowDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhenhua ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Canbin FangDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Peiyao YuDepartment of Pathology, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and Basic Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shihua ShiHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6475-2349
Shikun ZhouSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Guoming ChenSchool of Chinese Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhangding WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Shouyu WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
Xiaofan DingFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, China.
Bing HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li LiangDepartment of Pathology, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Pathology, Nanfang Hospital and Basic Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yujuan DongDepartment of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi Chun WongInstitute of Digestive Disease, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
William K K WuDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Alfred S L ChengSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Nathalie WongDepartment of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jun YuInstitute of Digestive Disease, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0918-8655
Kwok Wai LoDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Gary M K TseDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Wei KangDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4651-677X
Ka Fai ToDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir Y.K. Pao Cancer Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKNanfang Hospital · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNFriedrich Miescher Institute · CHSouth China University of Technology · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

Cheng Yue Pui Charity FoundationComprehensive Precision Oncology Program at The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Kingboard PROCURE Program)CUHK Direct Research Grant 2020.004CUHK Direct Research Grant 2022.001Health and Medical Research Fund 08190586National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 82272990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), integral to the tumour microenvironment, are pivotal in cancer progression, exhibiting either pro-tumourigenic or anti-tumourigenic functions. Their inherent phenotypic and functional diversity allows for the subdivision of CAFs into various subpopulations. While several classification systems have been suggested for different cancer types, a unified molecular classification of CAFs on a single-cell pan-cancer scale has yet to be established.

methodsWe employed a comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic atlas encompassing 12 solid tumour types. Our objective was to establish a novel molecular classification and to elucidate the evolutionary trajectories of CAFs. We investigated the functional profiles of each CAF subtype using Single-Cell Regulatory Network Inference and Clustering and single-cell gene set enrichment analysis. The clinical relevance of these subtypes was assessed through survival curve analysis. Concurrently, we employed multiplex immunofluorescence staining on tumour tissues to determine the dynamic changes of CAF subtypes across different tumour stages. Additionally, we identified the small molecule procyanidin C1 (PCC1) as a target for matrix-producing CAF (matCAF) using molecular docking techniques and further validated these findings through in vitro and in vivo experiments.

resultsIn our investigation of solid tumours, we identified four molecular clusters of CAFs: progenitor CAF (proCAF), inflammatory CAF (iCAF), myofibroblastic CAF (myCAF) and matCAF, each characterised by distinct molecular traits. This classification was consistently applicable across all nine studied solid tumour types. These CAF subtypes displayed unique evolutionary pathways, functional roles and clinical relevance in various solid tumours. Notably, the matCAF subtype was associated with poorer prognoses in several cancer types. The targeting of matCAF using the identified small molecule, PCC1, demonstrated promising antitumour activity.

conclusionsCollectively, the various subtypes of CAFs, particularly matCAF, are crucial in the initiation and progression of cancer. Focusing therapeutic strategies on targeting matCAF in solid tumours holds significant potential for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Cancer-Associated FibroblastsNeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMolecular Docking SimulationTranscriptomeTumor Microenvironmentcancer-associated fibroblastmolecular classificationpan-cancersingle-cell transcriptional atlas

Identifiers

PMID38148640
PMCPMC10751516
OpenAlexW4390276657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.