Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148366›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Influence of instrumentation type on outcomes after surgical management of spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Krisna S Maddy, Joseph Yunga Tigre, Victor M Lu, Meredith C Costello, Emily L Errante, Allan D Levi, S Shelby Burks

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krisna S MaddyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. Ksm129@med.miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2007-7668
Joseph Yunga TigreDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Victor M LuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Meredith C CostelloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Emily L ErranteDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Allan D LeviDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
S Shelby BurksDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10th Ave Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSpondylodiscitis refers to infection of the intervertebral disk and neighboring structures. Outcomes based on instrumentation type are not well reported in the literature, but are important in establishing guidelines for surgical management of spondylodiscitis. This study aims to clarify the effect of instrumentation material selection on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with spondylodiscitis.

methodsStudies that evaluated the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium, allograft, and/or autologous bone grafts for spondylodiscitis were identified in the literature. Radiographic and clinical data were analyzed using a meta-analysis of proportions, with estimated risk and confidence intervals reported for our primary study outcomes.

resultsThirty-two retrospective studies totaling 1088 patients undergoing surgical management of spondylodiscitis with PEEK, TTN, allograft, and autologous bone graft instrumentation were included. There were no differences in fusion rates (p-interaction = 0.55) with rates of fusion of 93.4% with TTN, 98.6% with allograft, 84.2% with autologous bone graft, and 93.9% with PEEK. There were no differences in screw loosening (p-interaction = 0.52) with rates of 0.33% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.3% with autologous bone graft, and 8.2% with PEEK. There were no differences in reoperation (p-interaction = 0.59) with rates of 2.64% with TTN, 0% with allograft, 1.69% with autologous bone graft, and 3.3% with PEEK.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrates that the choice of instrumentation type in the surgical management of spondylodiscitis resulted in no significant differences in rate of radiographic fusion, screw loosening, or reoperation. Future comparative studies to optimize guidelines for the management of spondylodiscitis are needed.

Indexed as

Bone TransplantationDiscitisBenzophenonesHumansKetonesPolymersSpinal FusionTitaniumTreatment OutcomeBenzophenonesKetonespolyetheretherketonePolymersTitaniumSpinal instrumentationSpine infectionSpondylodiscitis

Identifiers

PMID38148366
OpenAlexW4390226005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.