Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148327›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & medicine2023

Phase Ib study of anti-EGFR antibody (SCT200) in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody (SCT-I10A) for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Ming Bai, Yao Lu, Chunmei Shi, Jianwei Yang, Wei Li, Xianli Yin, Chenghui Huang, Lin Shen, Liangzhi Xie, Yi Ba

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04229537 (To Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of SCT-I10A Combined SCT200 or SCT-I10A Combined SCT200 Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04229537 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

To Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of SCT-I10A Combined SCT200 or SCT-I10A Combined SCT200 Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer: a Phase Ⅰb, Open-label, Multicenter Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinocelltech Ltd.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Colorectal CancerArmsSCT-I10A, SCT200, Chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Efficacy and safety of finotonlimab plus docetaxelTranslational lung cancer research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ming Bai *Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
Yao Lu *Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
Chunmei ShiFujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Jianwei YangFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Wei LiCancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
Xianli YinDepartment of Medical Oncology Gastroenterology and Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Chenghui HuangDepartment of Oncology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Lin ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Liangzhi XieBeijing Engineering Research Center of Protein and Antibody, Sinocelltech Ltd., Beijing 100176, China.
Yi BaDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0255-4376
Central South University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNJilin University · CNPeking University · CNSinocelltech Group (China) · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82103677National Science and Technology Major Projects of China 2019ZX09732-001Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-009A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody (SCT200) and an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody (SCT-I10A) as third-line or subsequent therapies in patients with rat sarcoma viral oncogene (RAS)/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib clinical trial. Patients with histologically confirmed RAS/BRAF wt mCRC with more than two lines of treatment were enrolled and treated with SCT-I10A and SCT200. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsTwenty-one patients were enrolled in the study through January 28, 2023. The ORR was 28.57% and the DCR was 85.71% (18/21). The median PFS and OS were 4.14 and 12.84 months, respectively. The treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were tolerable. Moreover, compared with the monotherapy cohort from our previous phase I study evaluating SCT200 for RAS/BRAF wt mCRC in a third-line setting, no significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in the combination group.

conclusionsSCT200 combined with SCT-I10A demonstrated promising efficacy in previously treated RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients with an acceptable safety profile. Further head-to-head studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate whether the efficacy and safety of combined anti-EGFR and anti-PD-1 therapy are superior to anti-EGFR monotherapy in the third-line setting. (Registration No. NCT04229537).

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBRAF protein, humancamrelizumabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raftoripalimabColorectal cancerepidermal growth factor receptorprogrammed cell death 1SCT200SCT-I10A

Identifiers

PMID38148327
PMCPMC11271220
OpenAlexW4390234848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.