Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38148272›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2024

Flexible protein-protein docking with a multitrack iterative transformer.

Lee-Shin Chu, Jeffrey A Ruffolo, Ameya Harmalkar, Jeffrey J Gray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Scalable Framework for Comprehensive Typing of Polymorphic Immune Genes from Long-Read Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Machine-Learned Representations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Flexible protein-protein docking with a multitrack iterative transformer.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lee-Shin ChuDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-642X
Jeffrey A RuffoloProgram in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ameya HarmalkarDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey J GrayDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-2324
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008403 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 1990 to 2019
$13.5M
Prediction of the Structures of Protein ComplexesR35GM141881 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY J GRAY · 2021 to 2026
$7.6M
Program of Molecular BiophysicsT32GM135131 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Karen G. Fleming · 2020 to 2026
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141881NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008403NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional protein-protein docking algorithms usually rely on heavy candidate sampling and reranking, but these steps are time-consuming and hinder applications that require high-throughput complex structure prediction, for example, structure-based virtual screening. Existing deep learning methods for protein-protein docking, despite being much faster, suffer from low docking success rates. In addition, they simplify the problem to assume no conformational changes within any protein upon binding (rigid docking). This assumption precludes applications when binding-induced conformational changes play a role, such as allosteric inhibition or docking from uncertain unbound model structures. To address these limitations, we present GeoDock, a multitrack iterative transformer network to predict a docked structure from separate docking partners. Unlike deep learning models for protein structure prediction that input multiple sequence alignments, GeoDock inputs just the sequences and structures of the docking partners, which suits the tasks when the individual structures are given. GeoDock is flexible at the protein residue level, allowing the prediction of conformational changes upon binding. On the Database of Interacting Protein Structures (DIPS) test set, GeoDock achieves a 43% top-1 success rate, outperforming all other tested methods. However, in the standard DIPS train/test splits, we discovered contamination of close homologs in the training set. After decontaminating the training set, the success rate is 31%. On the DB5.5 test set and a benchmark dataset of antibody-antigen complexes, GeoDock outperforms the deep learning models trained using the same dataset but falls behind most of the conventional methods and AlphaFold-Multimer. GeoDock attains an average inference speed of under 1 s on a single GPU, enabling its application in large-scale structure screening. Although binding-induced conformational changes are still a challenge owing to limited training and evaluation data, our architecture sets up the foundation to capture this backbone flexibility. Code and a demonstration Jupyter notebook are available at https://github.com/Graylab/GeoDock.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsSalicylatesMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingProtein Conformation3,5-diisopropylsalicylic acidProteinsSalicylatesdeep learningflexible protein dockingprotein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID38148272
PMCPMC10804679
OpenAlexW4390245367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.