ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Current Position of Oncofertility in Adolescent Female Cancer Patients: A Comparative Review on Society Guidelines.
Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue - what's known so far and future perspectives.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Female germline stem cells: recent advances, opportunities, and challenges to overcome.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025Review
- Fertility Preservation in Female Children and Adolescent Cancer Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fertility preservation options at cancer diagnosis; classifying use and decision-making in the United States.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Review
- [Reproductive Strategies for Declining Fertility: Fertility Preservation].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fertility preservation (FP) in pediatric and adolescent oncology patients presents a complex interplay between cancer treatment imperatives and reproductive aspirations, demanding a multi-disciplinary approach. Essential guidelines emphasize the importance of early referrals to FP specialists, ensuring timely counseling on oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation options. Proper patient selection and risk assessment, considering intrinsic and extrinsic factors, is crucial for judicious resource utilization and optimal outcomes. Gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatments pose significant threats to reproductive capabilities. Oocyte cryopreservation (OC) is preferred in post-pubertal adolescents without partners. Cultural and religious concerns, especially regarding hymenal integrity, influence FP decisions, necessitating culturally sensitive consent processes. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) offers an alternative for those unfit for OC. Despite its experimental label in some societies, emerging data support the efficacy of OTC, with ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) showing promise in restoring ovarian function. However, the reintroduction of potentially malignant cells during transplantation remains a concern. Overall, while FP offers hope for future parenthood, the intricacies of decision-making and the potential medical, ethical, and cultural challenges underscore the importance of a personalized, multi-disciplinary approach. In this review, guidelines from various societies have been comprehensively reviewed and analyzed to provide insight into the clinical practice of oncofertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.