Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147809›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2024

Muscle activation and coordinated movements of infant rolling.

Danielle N Siegel, Safeer F Siddicky, Wyatt D Davis, Erin M Mannen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle N SiegelBiomedical Engineering Doctoral Program, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Safeer F SiddickyMechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States; Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Wyatt D DavisMechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
Erin M MannenBiomedical Engineering Doctoral Program, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States; Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States. Electronic address: ErinMannen@boisestate.edu.

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Scott A Minnich · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
VPS35 D620N inhibits autophagy through disrupted hyaluronic acid-CD44 signalingP20GM109095 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OCHOA-REPARAZ, JAVIER · 2014 to 2023
$22.7M
Optimizing Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease.P20GM148321 · NIGMS · BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Paul Henry Davis · 2023 to 2026
$10.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109095NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM148321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rolling is a critical step of infant development, encouraging muscle coordination and enabling independent exploration. Understanding muscle activity during infant rolling movements on a flat surface is necessary to more fully characterize how the rolling milestone is achieved. The purpose of this study was to determine infants' muscle activation throughout roll initiation for six previously established coordinated movements. Thirty-eight healthy infants (age: 6.5 ± 0.7 months; 23M/15F) were enrolled in this IRB-approved in-vivo biomechanics study. Surface electromyography sensors recorded muscle utilization from the erector spinae, abdominal muscles, quadriceps, and hamstrings while infants rolled. Each rolling movement was categorized as one of six roll types, and the mean muscle activity was analyzed. All roll types required initial activation of all measured muscle groups. Movements featuring axial rotation of the torso relative to the pelvis required highly active erector spinae muscles. Movements featuring trunk and hip flexion required highly active abdominal muscles. Infants used distinct coordinated muscle activations to achieve the six different roll types on a flat surface. A foundational understanding of the different muscle activation patterns required during infant rolling will provide crucial insight into motor development. This study quantified muscle coordination required of infants to achieve rolling on a firm flat surface. Previous research indicates that the mechanical environment in which an infant is placed impacts muscle activity and body position during normal lying. Therefore, future work should explore if mechanical environments that differ from a flat and firm surface also influence these coordinated movements and muscle activations.

Indexed as

MovementPostureAbdomenAbdominal MusclesChildElectromyographyHumansInfantMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalBiomechanicsMotor developmentPediatricsProduct safety

Identifiers

PMID38147809
PMCPMC10898450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.