Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147743›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials2024

Engineered 3D ex vivo models to recapitulate the complex stromal and immune interactions within the tumor microenvironment.

Kalpana Ravi, Twinkle Jina Minette Manoharan, Kuei-Chun Wang, Barbara Pockaj, Mehdi Nikkhah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging Microphysiological Systems to Facilitate Neutrophil-Based Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kalpana RaviSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering (SBHSE), Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Twinkle Jina Minette ManoharanSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering (SBHSE), Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Kuei-Chun WangSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering (SBHSE), Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Barbara PockajDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Mehdi NikkhahSchool of Biological and Health Systems Engineering (SBHSE), Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA; Biodesign Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA. Electronic address: mnikkhah@asu.edu.

Funding

Elucidating the Role of Perivascular Niche in Glioblastoma Invasion and Therapeutic Resistance at Single Cell Resolution using Biomimetic Tumor Microenvironment ModelsR01NS123038 · NINDS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NIKKHAH, MEHDI · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer thrives in a complex environment where interactions between cellular and acellular components, surrounding the tumor, play a crucial role in disease development and progression. Despite significant progress in cancer research, the mechanism driving tumor growth and therapeutic outcomes remains elusive. Two-dimensional (2D) cell culture assays and in vivo animal models are commonly used in cancer research and therapeutic testing. However, these models suffer from numerous shortcomings including lack of key features of the tumor microenvironment (TME) & cellular composition, cost, and ethical clearance. To that end, there is an increased interest in incorporating and elucidating the influence of TME on cancer progression. Advancements in 3D-engineered ex vivo models, leveraging biomaterials and microengineering technologies, have provided an unprecedented ability to reconstruct native-like bioengineered cancer models to study the heterotypic interactions of TME with a spatiotemporal organization. These bioengineered cancer models have shown excellent capabilities to bridge the gap between oversimplified 2D systems and animal models. In this review article, we primarily provide an overview of the immune and stromal cellular components of the TME and then discuss the latest state-of-the-art 3D-engineered ex vivo platforms aiming to recapitulate the complex TME features. The engineered TME model, discussed herein, are categorized into three main sections according to the cellular interactions within TME: (i) Tumor-Stromal interactions, (ii) Tumor-Immune interactions, and (iii) Complex TME interactions. Finally, we will conclude the article with a perspective on how these models can be instrumental for cancer translational studies and therapeutic testing.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell CommunicationCell Culture TechniquesBiocompatible Materials3D-engineered models3D printedImmune crosstalkMicrofluidicsTumor immune microenvironment (TIME)Tumor microenvironment (TME)Tumor-on-chip

Identifiers

PMID38147743
PMCPMC11098715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.