Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147502›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2023

Patient- and family-centred care transition interventions for adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Julie Chartrand, Beverley Shea, Brian Hutton, Orvie Dingwall, Anupriya Kakkar, Mariève Chartrand, Ariane Poulin, Chantal Backman

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resilience practices of healthcare professionals during the hospital discharge process: a qualitative study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie ChartrandSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9075-054X
Beverley SheaSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Moran Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Brian HuttonSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Moran Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Orvie DingwallNeil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, 727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3P5, Canada.
Anupriya KakkarSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Private, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Mariève ChartrandCollège La Cité, 801 Aviation Parkway, Ottawa, Ontario K1K 4R3, Canada.
Ariane PoulinSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
Chantal BackmanSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CALa Cité Collégiale · CA

Funding

University of Ottawa Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although patient centredness is part of providing high-quality health care, little is known about the effectiveness of care transition interventions that involve patients and their families on readmissions to the hospital or emergency visits post-discharge. This systematic review (SR) aimed to examine the evidence on patient- and family-centred (PFC) care transition interventions and evaluate their effectiveness on adults' hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits after discharge. Searches of Medline, CINAHL, and Embase databases were conducted from the earliest available online year of indexing up to and including 14 March 2021. The studies included: (i) were about care transitions (hospital to home) of ≥18-year-old patients; (ii) had components of patient-centred care and care transition frameworks; (iii) reported on one or more outcomes were among hospital readmissions and ED visits after discharge; and (iv) were cluster-, pilot- or randomized-controlled trials published in English or French. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was performed, and pooled odd ratios, standardized mean differences, and mean differences were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Of the 10,021 citations screened, 50 trials were included in the SR and 44 were included in the meta-analyses. Care transition intervention types included health assessment, symptom and disease management, medication reconciliation, discharge planning, risk management, complication detection, and emotional support. Results showed that PFC care transition interventions significantly reduced the risk of hospital readmission rates compared to usual care [incident rate ratio (IRR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.98; I2 = 73%] regardless of time elapsed since discharge. However, these same interventions had minimal impact on the risk of ED visit rates compared to usual care group regardless of time passed after discharge (IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.18; I2 = 29%). PFC care transition interventions containing a greater number of patient-centred care (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; I2 = 59%) and care transition components (IRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; I2 = 4%) significantly decreased the risk of patients being readmitted. However, these interventions did not significantly increase the risk of patients visiting the ED after discharge (IRR, 1.54; CI 95%, 0.91-2.61). Future interventions should focus on patients' and families' values, beliefs, needs, preferences, race, age, gender, and social determinants of health to improve the quality of adults' care transitions.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePatient TransferAdolescentAdultAftercareHospitalsHumansPatient Readmissioncaregiversemergency servicefamilypatient readmissionsystematic reviewtransitional care

Identifiers

PMID38147502
PMCPMC10750974
OpenAlexW4390225427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.