Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147336›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Implementation of Recommendations on the Use of Corticosteroids in Severe COVID-19.

Félix Camirand-Lemyre, Laura Merson, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Aidan J C Burrell, Barbara Wanjiru Citarella, Marie-Pier Domingue, Simon Lévesque, Effua Usuf, Evert-Jan Wils, Shinichiro Ohshimo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

Félix Camirand-LemyreUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Laura MersonISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi VijayaraghavanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Main Hospital, Chennai, India.
Aidan J C BurrellDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Barbara Wanjiru CitarellaISARIC, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marie-Pier DomingueUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Simon LévesqueUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Effua UsufMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Evert-Jan WilsFranciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Shinichiro OhshimoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ignacio Martin-LoechesDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Research Organization (MICRO), St James's Hospital Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.
Oana SandulescuDepartment of Infectious Diseases I, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Jon Henrik LaakeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care and Emergencies, Rikshospitalet Medical Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
François LamontagneUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Group
Université de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Oxford · GBApollo Hospitals · INCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROErasmus MC · NLHiroshima University · JPMRC Unit the Gambia · GMOslo University Hospital · NOSt. James's Hospital · IEThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00031/7Medical Research Council MR/S032304/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Research diversity and representativeness are paramount in building trust, generating valid biomedical knowledge, and possibly in implementing clinical guidelines. Objectives: To compare variations over time and across World Health Organization (WHO) geographic regions of corticosteroid use for treatment of severe COVID-19; secondary objectives were to evaluate the association between the timing of publication of the RECOVERY (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy) trial (June 2020) and the WHO guidelines for corticosteroids (September 2020) and the temporal trends observed in corticosteroid use by region and to describe the geographic distribution of the recruitment in clinical trials that informed the WHO recommendation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study of 434 851 patients was conducted between January 31, 2020, and September 2, 2022, in 63 countries worldwide. The data were collected under the auspices of the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC)-WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections. Analyses were restricted to patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 (a subset of the ISARIC data set). Exposure: Corticosteroid use as reported to the ISARIC-WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol for Severe Emerging Infections. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and percentage of patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 who received corticosteroids by time period and by WHO geographic region. Results: Among 434 851 patients with confirmed severe or critical COVID-19 for whom receipt of corticosteroids could be ascertained (median [IQR] age, 61.0 [48.0-74.0] years; 53.0% male), 174 307 (40.1%) received corticosteroids during the study period. Of the participants in clinical trials that informed the guideline, 91.6% were recruited from the United Kingdom. In all regions, corticosteroid use for severe COVID-19 increased, but this increase corresponded to the timing of the RECOVERY trial (time-interruption coefficient 1.0 [95% CI, 0.9-1.2]) and WHO guideline (time-interruption coefficient 1.9 [95% CI, 1.7-2.0]) publications only in Europe. At the end of the study period, corticosteroid use for treatment of severe COVID-19 was highest in the Americas (5421 of 6095 [88.9%]; 95% CI, 87.7-90.2) and lowest in Africa (31 588 of 185 191 [17.1%]; 95% CI, 16.8-17.3). Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study showed that implementation of the guidelines for use of corticosteroids in the treatment of severe COVID-19 varied geographically. Uptake of corticosteroid treatment was lower in regions with limited clinical trial involvement. Improving research diversity and representativeness may facilitate timely knowledge uptake and guideline implementation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adrenal Cortex HormonesAfricaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAdrenal Cortex Hormones

Identifiers

PMID38147336
PMCPMC10751594
OpenAlexW4390236957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.