Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147334›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Prediction of 2-Year Cognitive Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants Using Machine Learning Methods.

Andrea K Bowe, Gordon Lightbody, Anthony Staines, Deirdre M Murray, Mikael Norman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prematurity and Genetic Liability for Autism Spectrum Disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea K BoweINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gordon LightbodyINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Anthony StainesSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy, and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Deirdre M MurrayINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mikael NormanDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
University College Cork · IEDublin City University · IEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Early intervention can improve cognitive outcomes for very preterm infants but is resource intensive. Identifying those who need early intervention most is important. Objective: To evaluate a model for use in very preterm infants to predict cognitive delay at 2 years of age using routinely available clinical and sociodemographic data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study was based on the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Nationwide coverage of neonatal data was reached in 2011, and registration of follow-up data opened on January 1, 2015, with inclusion ending on September 31, 2022. A variety of machine learning models were trained and tested to predict cognitive delay. Surviving infants from neonatal units in Sweden with a gestational age younger than 32 weeks and complete data for the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition cognitive index or cognitive scale scores at 2 years of corrected age were assessed. Infants with major congenital anomalies were excluded. Exposures: A total of 90 variables (containing sociodemographic and clinical information on conditions, investigations, and treatments initiated during pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal unit admission) were examined for predictability. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cognitive function at 2 years, categorized as screening positive for cognitive delay (cognitive index score <90) or exhibiting typical cognitive development (score ≥90). Results: A total of 1062 children (median [IQR] birth weight, 880 [720-1100] g; 566 [53.3%] male) were included in the modeling process, of whom 231 (21.8%) had cognitive delay. A logistic regression model containing 26 predictive features achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83). The 5 most important features for cognitive delay were non-Scandinavian family language, prolonged duration of hospitalization, low birth weight, discharge to other destination than home, and the infant not receiving breastmilk on discharge. At discharge from the neonatal unit, the full model could correctly identify 605 of 650 infants who would have cognitive delay at 24 months (sensitivity, 0.93) and 1081 of 2350 who would not (specificity, 0.46). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that predictive modeling in neonatal care could enable early and targeted intervention for very preterm infants most at risk for developing cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesBirth WeightCognitionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMachine LearningMalePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38147334
PMCPMC10751596
OpenAlexW4390236976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.