ArticleJAMA network open2023
Prediction of 2-Year Cognitive Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants Using Machine Learning Methods.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunities and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Clinical Outcomes and Length of Stay in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Early interventions with parental participation and their implications on the neurodevelopment of premature children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning techniques for predicting neurodevelopmental impairments in premature infants: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Immediate Skin-to-Skin Contact in Very Preterm Neonates and Early Childhood Neurodevelopment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Multisensory Early Oral Administration of Human Milk (M-MILK) for Very Preterm Infants: Enhancing Stress Regulation, Neurodevelopment, and Oral Feeding Skills.Biological research for nursing · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants: An Exploratory Multivariable Analysis Including Sonographic Brain Volume Trajectories-Data from the NeoNEVS Project.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developing and Validating a Machine Learning Model to Predict Brain Injury in Preterm Infants Using Multisource Data from the Early Postnatal Period.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Review
- Assessment of the effects of ethnicity, home language, and socioeconomic status on neurodevelopmental performance in a multiethnic population.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Early postnatal risk stratification for severe adverse outcomes in twin neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit: development and temporal validation of an interpretable machine learning model.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Five-Minute Apgar Scores and Its Prognostic Value for Mortality and Severe Morbidity in Very Preterm Infants: A Multinational Cohort Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Observational
- Predicting off-track development in infants aged 0-6 months in low-resource settings using machine learning.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- High-risk infant follow-up: current practice and factors determining eligibility.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Prematurity and genetic liability for autism spectrum disorder.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning in early childhood development research: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Co-developing an intervention to facilitate safe and early transition to neonatal home care for very preterm infants: a mixed-method study evaluating the impact of patient and public involvement.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Prematurity and Genetic Liability for Autism Spectrum Disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- The shifting landscape of the preterm brain.Neuron · 2025Review
- Prediction of high-risk pregnancy based on machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Construction and Validation of a PCA-Based Prediction Model for Preterm Infant Stunting Risk: A Retrospective Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Early intervention can improve cognitive outcomes for very preterm infants but is resource intensive. Identifying those who need early intervention most is important. Objective: To evaluate a model for use in very preterm infants to predict cognitive delay at 2 years of age using routinely available clinical and sociodemographic data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study was based on the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Nationwide coverage of neonatal data was reached in 2011, and registration of follow-up data opened on January 1, 2015, with inclusion ending on September 31, 2022. A variety of machine learning models were trained and tested to predict cognitive delay. Surviving infants from neonatal units in Sweden with a gestational age younger than 32 weeks and complete data for the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition cognitive index or cognitive scale scores at 2 years of corrected age were assessed. Infants with major congenital anomalies were excluded. Exposures: A total of 90 variables (containing sociodemographic and clinical information on conditions, investigations, and treatments initiated during pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal unit admission) were examined for predictability. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cognitive function at 2 years, categorized as screening positive for cognitive delay (cognitive index score <90) or exhibiting typical cognitive development (score ≥90). Results: A total of 1062 children (median [IQR] birth weight, 880 [720-1100] g; 566 [53.3%] male) were included in the modeling process, of whom 231 (21.8%) had cognitive delay. A logistic regression model containing 26 predictive features achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83). The 5 most important features for cognitive delay were non-Scandinavian family language, prolonged duration of hospitalization, low birth weight, discharge to other destination than home, and the infant not receiving breastmilk on discharge. At discharge from the neonatal unit, the full model could correctly identify 605 of 650 infants who would have cognitive delay at 24 months (sensitivity, 0.93) and 1081 of 2350 who would not (specificity, 0.46). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that predictive modeling in neonatal care could enable early and targeted intervention for very preterm infants most at risk for developing cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.