Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147333›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Profiles of Cognitive Functioning at 6 Months After Traumatic Brain Injury Among Patients in Level I Trauma Centers: A TRACK-TBI Study.

Andrew M Bryant, Nathan B Rose, Nancy R Temkin, Jason K Barber, Geoffrey T Manley, Michael A McCrea, Lindsay D Nelson, TRACK-TBI Investigators, Neeraj Badjatia, Shankar Gopinath and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Synaptic Pathology in Traumatic Brain Injury and Therapeutic Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew M BryantDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Nathan B RoseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Nancy R TemkinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jason K BarberDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Geoffrey T ManleyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Michael A McCreaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Lindsay D NelsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
TRACK-TBI Investigators
Neeraj BadjatiaSchool of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Shankar GopinathNeurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
C Dirk KeeneDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Christopher MaddenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Laura B NgwenyaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Ava PuccioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Claudia RobertsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
David SchnyerDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
Sabrina R TaylorDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
John K YueDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USSouthwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Patient Classification and Outcome Measurement in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)R01NS110856 · NINDS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI NELSON, LINDSAY · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cognitive dysfunction is common after traumatic brain injury (TBI), with a well-established dose-response relationship between TBI severity and likelihood or magnitude of persistent cognitive impairment. However, patterns of cognitive dysfunction in the long-term (eg, 6-month) recovery period are less well known. Objective: To characterize the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction within and across cognitive domains (processing speed, memory, and executive functioning) 6 months after injury in patients with TBI seen at level I trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective longitudinal cohort study used data from Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) and included patients aged 17 years or older presenting at 18 US level I trauma center emergency departments or inpatient units within 24 hours of head injury, control individuals with orthopedic injury recruited from the same centers, and uninjured friend and family controls. Participants were enrolled between March 2, 2014, and July 27, 2018. Data were analyzed from March 5, 2020, through October 3, 2023. Exposures: Traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3-15) or orthopedic injury. Main Outcomes and Measures: Performance on standard neuropsychological tests, including premorbid cognitive ability (National Institutes of Health Toolbox Picture Vocabulary Test), verbal memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test), processing speed (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale [4th edition] Processing Speed Index), and executive functioning (Trail Making Test). Results: The sample included 1057 persons with TBI (mean [SD] age, 39.3 [16.4] years; 705 [67%] male) and 327 controls without TBI (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [15.1] years; 222 [68%] male). Most persons with TBI demonstrated performance within 1.5 SDs or better of the control group (49.3% [95% CI, 39.5%-59.2%] to 67.5% [95% CI, 63.7%-71.2%] showed no evidence of impairment). Similarly, 64.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-73.4%) to 78.8% (95% CI, 75.4%-81.9%) of participants demonstrated no evidence of cognitive decline (defined as performance within 1.5 SDs of estimated premorbid ability). For individuals with evidence of either cognitive impairment or decline, diverse profiles of impairment across memory, speed, and executive functioning domains were observed (ie, the prevalence was >0 in each of the 7 combinations of impairment across these 3 cognitive domains for most TBI subgroups). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients seen at level I trauma centers 6 months after TBI, many patients with TBI demonstrated no cognitive impairment. Impairment was more prevalent in persons with more severe TBI and manifested in variable ways across individuals. The findings may guide future research and treatment recommendations.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticAdultCognitionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38147333
PMCPMC10751593
OpenAlexW4390227176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.