Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147330›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Negative Wealth Shock and Cognitive Decline and Dementia in Middle-Aged and Older US Adults.

Liulu Pan, Bin Gao, Junpeng Zhu, Jing Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia: an overview of established and emerging evidence].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Scammers' Psychological Warfare: A Call to Arms.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liulu PanZhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Bin GaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Junpeng ZhuCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, China.
Jing GuoZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Therapy for Major Gynecological Diseases, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: As a financial hardship, negative wealth shock has been implicated in some adverse health outcomes. However, associations between negative wealth shock and cognitive decline and dementia have not been examined. Objective: To investigate whether negative wealth shock was associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia among middle-aged and older US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) is a prospective cohort study conducted biennially among US adults older than 50 years. Data from the HRS from calendar years 1996 to 2020 were analyzed from July 1 to 31, 2023. The final sample included 8082 participants with complete data of interest. Exposures: Wealth status was quantified with questionnaires. Negative wealth shock was defined as a loss of 75% or more in total wealth over a 2-year period. Asset poverty was defined as zero or less total net wealth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive function was assessed with the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m). Dementia status was determined with TICS-m scores and proxy assessment. Results: Among 8082 participants included (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [5.7] years; 4179 women [51.7%] and 3903 men [48.3%]; 1111 Black [13.7%], 6689 White [82.7%], and 282 other [3.5%]), 1441 developed incident dementia over a median follow-up time of 14 (IQR, 7-20) years. Compared with participants who had positive wealth without shock, those with negative wealth shock had accelerated cognitive decline (β coefficient, -0.014 [95% CI, -0.027 to -0.001]; P = .03) and increased risks of dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27 [95% CI, 1.11-1.46]; P < .001). Higher dementia risks were also found in participants with asset poverty at baseline (HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.30-2.00]; P < .001). Associations were found in White participants (HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.14-1.58]; P < .001) and participants younger than 65 years (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.13-1.68]; P = .001) but not in other races and ethnicities or those 65 years or older. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, negative wealth shock was associated with accelerated cognitive decline and elevated risks of dementia among middle-aged and older US adults, with modifications by age and ethnicity. These findings should be confirmed by further prospective and interventional studies.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaShockAdultAgedCognitionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38147330
PMCPMC10751595
OpenAlexW4390237140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.