ArticleHormones (Athens, Greece)2024
Comparison of clinical characteristics of a pediatric cohort with combined pituitary hormone deficiency caused by mutation of the PROP1 gene or of other origins.
Article in Hormones (Athens, Greece), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most commonly identified genetic cause of combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) is PROP1 gene mutations. The aim of the study was to compare selected clinical features of patients with CPHD caused by variants of the PROP1 gene (CPHD-PROP1) and patients with inborn CPHD of other etiology (CPHD-nonPROP1). MATERIAL AND
methodsThe retrospective analysis included childhood medical records of 74 patients (32 female) with CPHD, including 43 patients (23 female) with the mutation in the PROP1 gene.
resultsPatients with CPHD-PROP1 compared to the CPHD-nonPROP1 presented with the following: significantly higher median birth weight (0.21 vs. - 0.29 SDS, p = 0.019), lower growth velocity within 3 years preceding growth hormone administration (- 2.7 vs. - 0.8 SDS, p < 0.001), higher mean maximal blood concentration of growth hormone within the stimulation process (1.2 vs. 1.08 ng/mL, p = 0.003), lower TSH (1.8 vs. 2.4 µIU/mL, p < 0.001), significantly lower prolactin concentrations (128 vs. 416.3 µIU/mL, p < 0.001), and less frequent typical signs of hypogonadism at birth in boys (n = 6; 30% vs. n = 12, 54%, p < 0.001). Secondary adrenal insufficiency was less frequent in CPHD-PROP1 (20 vs. 25 cases, p = 0.006) and occurred at a later age (13.4 vs. 10.4 years). MRI of the pituitary gland in CPHD-PROP1 revealed a small pituitary gland (21 cases), pituitary gland enlargement (eight cases), and one pituitary stalk interruption and posterior lobe ectopy, while it was normal in nine cases.
conclusionPatients with the PROP1 mutations present a clinical picture significantly different from that of other forms of congenital hypopituitarism. Certain specific clinical results may lead to the successful identification of children requiring diagnostics for the PROP1 gene mutation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.