Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147282›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2024

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Review.

Lucky Krog, Jillian Maloney, Scott Pew, Olufunmilola Adeleye, Brooks Johnson, Brett Glenn, Benjamin Gill, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Robert Pagan-Rosado, Madeline Whitney and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lucky KrogMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. kirigo.lucky@mayo.edu.
Jillian MaloneyDivision of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Scott PewDivision of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Olufunmilola AdeleyeMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Brooks JohnsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Brett GlennCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Benjamin GillDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Vinicius Tieppo FrancioUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Robert Pagan-RosadoDepartment of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Madeline WhitneyMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Neil SinhaMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Natalie StrandDivision of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis literature review critically examines existing studies on cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) for the treatment of chronic pain. The objective is to evaluate the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and collate data to inform clinical decision-making and suggest future research avenues. The review covers indications, contraindications, surgical and anesthetic approaches, trials, efficacy, and complications of cSCS. RECENT

findingsRecent advancements highlight the evolving role of cSCS in chronic pain management. New neuromodulation techniques involve optimal placement of leads based on the pain's innervation level, maximizing therapeutic outcomes. Contemporary studies underscore the broadening benefits of cSCS, including enhanced functional abilities and sleep quality. However, alongside these innovations come challenges; emerging data bring attention to complications such as hardware issues and infections. Significantly, modern research emphasizes the crucial role of accurate patient selection, factoring in prior therapy responses and comprehensive evaluations. cSCS emerges as a promising tool for chronic pain management, with benefits beyond mere pain relief. As surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and postoperative care refine, the potential of cSCS expands to benefit a broader patient demographic. However, further comprehensive research is necessary to enhance its application, validate its role earlier in treatment, and ultimately ameliorate the lives of those with chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSpinal Cord StimulationHumansPain ManagementCervical painNeuromodulationPainSpinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.