Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38147191›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2024

Five-Year BAROS Score Outcomes for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study.

Saeed Madani, Masoumeh Shahsavan, Abdolreza Pazouki, Seyed Amin Setarehdan, Fahimeh Yarigholi, Foolad Eghbali, Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri, Mohammad Kermansaravi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saeed MadaniMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Masoumeh ShahsavanMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mashahsavan@yahoo.com.
Abdolreza PazoukiDivision of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Amin SetarehdanMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fahimeh YarigholiMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Foolad EghbaliDivision of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahab Shahabi ShahmiriDivision of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad KermansaraviDivision of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mkermansaravi@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8978-9359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has been shown to enhance the quality of life (QoL) in individuals with obesity. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) is a highly reliable scoring system utilized to assess weight loss, obesity-associated medical conditions, and QoL following MBS. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in improving health outcomes for individuals with severe obesity, employing the BAROS questionnaire.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted, enrolling 299 patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or higher who had undergone primary MBS (RYGB, OAGB, or SG) and had a 5-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated using the BAROS scoring system, which included measures of % excess weight loss (%EWL), improvement and remission of obesity-related medical problems, and postoperative short-term and long-term complications.

resultsThe mean age and pre-op BMI of the patients was 39.4 ± 9.4 years and 44.6± 6.5 kg/m

conclusionThis study demonstrated that all three common metabolic and bariatric surgical procedures (SG, RYGB, and OAGB) significantly improved the QoL after surgery. Furthermore, patients who underwent OAGB had a significantly higher total BAROS score at the 5-year follow-up compared to those who underwent RYGB and SG.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansObesityQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryBAROSOne anastomosis gastric bypassQuality of lifeRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.