ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of non-medical students regarding impacted teeth: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awareness and Perception of Impacted Wisdom Teeth among Non-Medical Students in Salem: A Cross-Sectional Study.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) of non-medical students regarding impacted teeth and the factors associated with KAP. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled non-medical students at two universities (Northeastern University and Shenyang Conservatory of Music) in northeastern China between December 2022 and February 2023. Scores > 70% were defined as adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practice.
resultsA total of 519 non-medical students participated in this study. Most participants were male (54.72%), ≤ 20 years of age (72.83%), and freshmen (36.03%). The mean knowledge score was 4.98 ± 3.46 (possible range: 0-10), indicating poor knowledge (49.80%). The multivariable analysis showed that having impacted teeth were independently associated with adequate knowledge (OR = 3.114, 95% CI: 1.589-6.103, P = 0.001). The mean attitude score was 24.65 ± 3.78 (possible range: 7-35), indicating favorable attitudes (70.43%). The knowledge (OR = 1.182, 95% CI: 1.116-1.251, P < 0.001), junior grade (OR = 0.541, 95% CI: 0.327-0.895, P = 0.017), senior grade and above (OR = 0.477, 95% CI: 0.274-0.829, P = 0.009), and a history of impacted tooth extraction (OR = 2.386, 95% CI: 1.048-5.436, P = 0.038) were independently associated with the good attitudes. The mean practice score was 21.45 ± 5.64 (possible range: 6-30), indicating positive practice (71.50%). The knowledge (OR = 1.074, 95% CI: 1.017-1.133, P = 0.010) and female (OR = 1.501, 95% CI: 1.052-2.141, P = 0.025) were independently associated with the proactive practices.
conclusionsNon-medical students had poor knowledge but favorable attitudes and good practice toward impacted teeth. Non-medical students require additional education and awareness about the importance of early detection and management of impacted teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study highlights the need for improved education and awareness among non-medical students regarding impacted teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.