ReviewChild psychiatry and human development2025
Measurement Choices for Youth Suicidality.
Review in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nocturnal Autonomic Dysregulation and Admission-Window Clinical Suicide-Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Children and Adolescents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cognitive disengagement syndrome across attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and internalizing disorders: towards a transdiagnostic construct.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of suicide risk assessments in young Black populations internationally: a scoping review.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Review
- Introduction to the Special Issue: Measurement Based Care in Youth Depression and Suicidality.Child psychiatry and human development · 2025Article
- Characterizing Measurement-Based Care in the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN).Child psychiatry and human development · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the GHQ-28 suicidal ideation index in Spain and Mexico.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome and Autism Traits are Empirically Distinct from each Other and from Other Psychopathology Dimensions.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025Article
- Evidence-Based Youth Suicide Prevention and Intervention in Pediatric Primary Care Settings.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suicide is among the leading causes of death among individuals ages 10-24, making suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) a serious public health crisis among youth. Suicide risk screening and assessment are vital to addressing this public health crisis. In fact, many youths that screen positive for suicidal ideation do not have known mental health concerns and would have been missed if not asked directly. Medical settings are an optimal setting to detect suicidality early and provide appropriate follow-up monitoring and care as needed. To support effective and efficient screening and assessment of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, providers must choose measures with both strong psychometric properties and clinical utility. While measurement of STBs can vary across health settings, suicide risk screening and assessment typically involves gathering information about current suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviors, and suicidal plans via self-report questionnaires, clinical interviews, and/or computerized adaptive screens. In alignment with measurement-based care efforts, the current manuscript will provide a scoping review of measures of youth suicidal ideation, behavior, plans, and their risk factors. Specifically, the psychometric properties, clinical utility, and other key considerations for screening and assessment of adolescent suicide risk are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.