ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2023
Leveraging School Infection Data to Address Community COVID-19 Data Gaps.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt-home COVID-19 tests became available in the USA in April 2021 with widespread use by January 2022; however, the lack of infrastructure to report test results to public health agencies created a gap in public health data. Kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) schools often tracked COVID-19 cases among students and staff; leveraging school data may have helped bridge data gaps.
methodsWe examined infection rates reported by school districts to ABC Science Collaborative with corresponding community rates from March 15, 2021 to June 3, 2022. We computed weekly ratios of community-to-district-reported rates (reporting ratios) across 3 study periods (spring 2021, fall 2021, and spring 2022) and estimated the difference and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the average reporting ratio between study periods.
resultsIn spring 2021, before approval or widespread use of at-home testing, the community-reported infection rate was higher than the school-reported infection rate (reporting ratio: 1.40). In fall 2021 and spring 2022, as at-home testing rapidly increased, school-reported rates were higher than community-reported rates (reporting ratios: 0.82 and 0.66). Average reporting ratios decreased between spring 2021 and fall 2021 (-0.58, 95% CI -0.84, -0.32) and spring 2021 and spring 2022 (-0.73, 95% CI -0.96, -0.48); there was no significant change between fall 2021 and spring 2022 (-0.15, 95% CI -0.36, 0.06).
conclusionsAt-home COVID-19 testing resulted in significant data gaps; K-12 data could have supplemented community data. In future public health emergencies, reporting of school data could minimize data gaps, but requires additional resources including funding to track infections and standardized data reporting methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.