Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38146453›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Clinical Results and Factors Affecting Visual Function in Eyes Implanted with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens.

Kazuno Negishi, Sachiko Masui, Masahiko Ayaki, Hidemasa Torii, Erisa Yotsukura, Yasuyo Nishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kazuno NegishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑Ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-9810
Sachiko MasuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiko AyakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidemasa ToriiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Erisa YotsukuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyo NishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku‑Ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical results achieved with the enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with those of the monofocal IOL and investigate factors affecting the distance, intermediate, and near vision. Patients and Methods: Patients were included who underwent bilateral consecutive cataract surgeries using the same IOLs with follow-up to 1 month postoperatively. Refractions, monocular UDVA and CDVA, and binocular distance-corrected functional visual acuity at 5 meters (BDCFVA), at 66 centimeters (BDCIFVA) and at 40 centimeters (DCNVA) were assessed. Multiple regression analysis was used to assess the factors affecting binocular BDCFVA, BDCIFVA, and BDCNFVA. Subjective symptoms were assessed using the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Sixty patients (120 eyes) implanted with the Tecnis Eyhance IOL (30 patients, 60 eyes) or the Tecnis monofocal IOL (30 patients, 60 eyes) were included. The Tecnis Eyhance IOL provided significantly better binocular BDCIFVA than the Tecnis monofocal IOL in patients under 70 years of age. Multiple regression analysis showed that age was the only factor affecting distance and intermediate visual function in eyes with the Tecnis Eyhance IOL; gender, pupillary diameter, axial length, and average keratometry were not significant. There were no significant differences in subjective symptoms. Conclusion: The comprehensive cohort analysis did not confirm the advantage on the intermediate vision of the Tecnis Eyhance IOL. Younger age may be an important factor to benefit from the unique optical characteristics of this IOL.

Indexed as

agefunctional visual acuityintermediate visionpresbyopia correcting intraocular lens

Identifiers

PMID38146453
PMCPMC10749537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.