Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38146427›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2023

Dilute and shoot approach for toxicology testing.

Kenichi Tamama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-throughput UPLC-ESI/MSMS method for simultaneous measurement of the urinary metabolites of volatile organic compounds and tobacco alkaloids.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kenichi TamamaClinical Laboratories, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicology testing is performed in clinical settings, forensic settings, and for controlling doping. Drug screening is a toxicology test to determine if drugs are present in biological samples. The most common specimen type for drug testing is urine, as drugs and/or their metabolites are often more concentrated in the urine, extending the detection window of drugs. The dilute-and-shoot method is a simple procedure used in toxicology testing, where a sample is diluted before being directly injected into the liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) system. This method is easy, quick, and cost-saving, and can be used for protein-poor liquid specimens such as urine. Thus, it is reasonable and attractive for busy toxicology laboratories to combine the dilute-and-shoot method with high-resolution hyphenated-MS for urine drug screening. This method has several disadvantages, including a suboptimal detection capability for certain analytes, as well as interference from co-eluting matrix components called matrix effects, in which co-eluting matrix molecules alter the ionization efficiency of the analyte molecules at the ionization source in LC-MS, altering (mostly reducing) the analyte detection capability. The matrix effect testing is essential for the validation of LC-MS-based assays. A reasonable approach to addressing these undesirable effects would be to minimize these components. The most straightforward approach is to reduce the amounts of matrix components by using a higher dilution of the specimen and a lower volume for specimen injection. Optimization of the chromatographic separation is another reasonable approach for reducing co-eluting matrix components with the analyte.

Indexed as

dilute-and-shootliquid chromatography-mass spectrometrymatrix effectsample preparationtoxicology testingurine

Identifiers

PMID38146427
PMCPMC10749341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.