Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38146139›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Development and validation of models for predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage: A multicenter cohort study.

Cheng Chen, Baihui Zhao, Yu Pan, Lujiao Chen, Xiaofu Yang, Min Lv, Liping Qiu, Mengmeng Yang, Xia Ying, Minmin Wang and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Baihui ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9526-2278
Yu PanDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-9709-3606
Lujiao ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Xiaofu YangDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Min LvDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Liping QiuHuzhou Maternal & Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Mengmeng YangDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xia YingDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Minmin WangThe First People's Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou, China.
Huanhuan WangTraditional Chinese Medicine of Changxing, Huzhou, China.
Xiuying ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9447-2564
Xiaoxing ZhangHuzhou Maternal & Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Xiaofeng WengDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qiong LuoDepartment of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-4462
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital · CNHuzhou Women and Children's Hospital · CNFuyang City People's Hospital · CNHangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

4+X Clinical Research Project of Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University ZDFY2022-4X204Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 226-2022-00110the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2704600the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2704601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency cervical cerclage is a recognized method for preventing mid-trimester pregnancy loss and premature birth; however, its benefits remain controversial. This study aimed to establish preoperative models predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant patients with a high risk of preterm birth. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from patients who received emergency cerclage between 2015 and 2023 in three institutions. Patients were grouped into a derivation cohort (n = 141) and an independent validation cohort (n = 61). Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive variables and establish the models. Harrell's C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the models.

resultsThe models incorporated gestational weeks at cerclage placement, history of prior second-trimester loss and/or preterm birth, cervical dilation, and preoperative C-reactive protein level. The C-index of the model for predicting preterm birth before 28 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93) in the derivation cohort and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.92) in the independent validation cohort; The C-index of the model for predicting gestational latency was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84), respectively. In the derivation set, the areas under the curves were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.84 for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-week pregnancy prolongation, respectively. The corresponding values for the external validation were 0.78, 0.78, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves showed a good homogeneity between the observed and predicted ongoing pregnant probabilities. Decision curve analyses revealed satisfactory clinical usefulness.

conclusionsThese novel models provide reliable and valuable prognostic predictions for patients undergoing emergency cerclage. The models can assist clinicians and patients in making personalized clinical decisions before opting for the cervical cerclage.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondPrognosisRetrospective Studiescervical insufficiencyemergency cervical cerclagegestational latencynomogram modelspregnancy prolongationpreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID38146139
PMCPMC11019517
OpenAlexW4390235750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.