Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38146127›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2024

Development of an explainable artificial intelligence model for Asian vascular wound images.

Zhiwen Joseph Lo, Malcolm Han Wen Mak, Shanying Liang, Yam Meng Chan, Cheng Cheng Goh, Tina Lai, Audrey Tan, Patrick Thng, Jorge Rodriguez, Tillman Weyde and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhiwen Joseph LoDepartment of Surgery, Woodlands Health, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-5266
Malcolm Han Wen MakDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-0946
Shanying LiangDepartment of Surgery, Woodlands Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Yam Meng ChanDepartment of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Cheng Cheng GohWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Speciality, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Tina LaiWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Speciality, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Audrey TanWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Speciality, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Patrick ThngAITIS - Advanced Intelligence and Technology Innovations, London, United Kingdom.
Jorge RodriguezAITIS - Advanced Intelligence and Technology Innovations, London, United Kingdom.
Tillman WeydeAITIS - Advanced Intelligence and Technology Innovations, London, United Kingdom.
Sylvia SmitAITIS - Advanced Intelligence and Technology Innovations, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

AITISNational Healthcare Group PHG20/S/X/1/1National Medical Research Council FLWSHP19nov-0015Skin Research Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) H17/01/a0/0Y9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds contribute to significant healthcare and economic burden worldwide. Wound assessment remains challenging given its complex and dynamic nature. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning methods in wound analysis is promising. Explainable modelling can help its integration and acceptance in healthcare systems. We aim to develop an explainable AI model for analysing vascular wound images among an Asian population. Two thousand nine hundred and fifty-seven wound images from a vascular wound image registry from a tertiary institution in Singapore were utilized. The dataset was split into training, validation and test sets. Wound images were classified into four types (neuroischaemic ulcer [NIU], surgical site infections [SSI], venous leg ulcers [VLU], pressure ulcer [PU]), measured with automatic estimation of width, length and depth and segmented into 18 wound and peri-wound features. Data pre-processing was performed using oversampling and augmentation techniques. Convolutional and deep learning models were utilized for model development. The model was evaluated with accuracy, F1 score and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Explainability methods were used to interpret AI decision reasoning. A web browser application was developed to demonstrate results of the wound AI model with explainability. After development, the model was tested on additional 15 476 unlabelled images to evaluate effectiveness. After the development on the training and validation dataset, the model performance on unseen labelled images in the test set achieved an AUROC of 0.99 for wound classification with mean accuracy of 95.9%. For wound measurements, the model achieved AUROC of 0.97 with mean accuracy of 85.0% for depth classification, and AUROC of 0.92 with mean accuracy of 87.1% for width and length determination. For wound segmentation, an AUROC of 0.95 and mean accuracy of 87.8% was achieved. Testing on unlabelled images, the model confidence score for wound classification was 82.8% with an explainability score of 60.6%. Confidence score was 87.6% for depth classification with 68.0% explainability score, while width and length measurement obtained 93.0% accuracy score with 76.6% explainability. Confidence score for wound segmentation was 83.9%, while explainability was 72.1%. Using explainable AI models, we have developed an algorithm and application for analysis of vascular wound images from an Asian population with accuracy and explainability. With further development, it can be utilized as a clinical decision support system and integrated into existing healthcare electronic systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHealth FacilitiesHumansMachine LearningSoftwareartificial intelligencecomputer‐assisted image analysismachine learningvascular woundswound imaging

Identifiers

PMID38146127
PMCPMC10961881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.