ArticleRNA biology2024
A comparative survey of the influence of small self-cleaving ribozymes on gene expression in human cell culture.
Article in RNA biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing natural RNA triplex elements found in lncRNAs MALAT1 and NEAT1 for engineering of novel riboswitch platforms.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The Chromaverse Is Colored by Triplexes Formed Through the Interactions of Noncoding RNAs with HNPRNPU, TP53, AGO, REL Proteins, Intrinsically-Disordered Regions, and Flipons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Engineering of Small Ribozymes Acting on RNA: What is Needed to Make a New Function Work with an Existing Catalyst?Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025Review
- A recombinase-activated ribozyme to knock down endogenous gene expression in zebrafish.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Synthetic RNA biology.RNA biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-cleaving ribozymes are versatile tools for synthetic biologists when it comes to controlling gene expression. Up to date, 12 different classes are known, and over the past decades more and more details about their structure, cleavage mechanisms and natural environments have been uncovered. However, when these motifs are applied to mammalian gene expression constructs, the outcome can often be unexpected. A variety of factors, such as surrounding sequences and positioning of the ribozyme influences the activity and hence performance of catalytic RNAs. While some information about the efficiency of individual ribozymes (each tested in specific contexts) is known, general trends obtained from standardized, comparable experiments are lacking, complicating decisions such as which ribozyme to choose and where to insert it into the target mRNA. In many cases, application-specific optimization is required, which can be very laborious. Here, we systematically compared different classes of ribozymes within the 3'-UTR of a given reporter gene. We then examined position-dependent effects of the best-performing ribozymes. Moreover, we tested additional variants of already widely used hammerhead ribozymes originating from various organisms. We were able to identify functional structures suited for aptazyme design and generated highly efficient hammerhead ribozyme variants originating from the human genome. The present dataset will aide decisions about how to apply ribozymes for affecting gene expression as well as for developing ribozyme-based switches for controlling gene expression in human cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.