Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38146043›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2024

The wounding potential of assault rifles: analysis of the dimensions of entrance and exit wounds and comparison with conventional handguns. A multicentric study.

Anna Maria Manta, Pia Eugenia Ylenia Petrasso, Luca Tomassini, Gianluca Niccolò Piras, Alessandro De Maio, Simone Cappelletti, Marco Straccamore, Chiara Siodambro, Stefania De Simone, Vichan Peonim and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna Maria MantaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. annamaria.manta@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3464-3560
Pia Eugenia Ylenia PetrassoDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-3824
Luca TomassiniDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-7701
Gianluca Niccolò PirasDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-1373
Alessandro De MaioDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-8671
Simone CappellettiDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9331-4273
Marco StraccamoreDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-2376
Chiara SiodambroDepartment of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Stefania De SimoneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Vichan PeonimDepartment of Pathology, Division of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Luigi CipolloniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Legal Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6464-3249
Laura FulginitiDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Antonio OlivaDepartment of Health Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Wisarn WorasuwannarakDepartment of Pathology, Division of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9753-1662
Vittorio FineschiDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-3236
Costantino CiallellaDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Section of Legal Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-924X
Sapienza University of Rome · ITMahidol University · THUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appearance of a gunshot wound (GSW) is greatly influenced by the velocity of the projectile, where high-velocity projectiles (HVPs) are defined as ballistic agents reaching a muzzle velocity of > 600 m/s fired from assault rifles. The aim of the study is to present and explain the differences in the dimensions of entrance and exit wounds between the most used handguns and assault rifles and to propose a predictor of HVP, i.e., the ratio of exit and entrance wounds (EX/ENR). The surface area of entrance and exit GSWs and the EX/ENR were calculated. 66 perforating GSWs produced by NATO FMJ 7.62 × 52 mm and 5.56 × 42 mm fired from assault rifles were assigned to the HVP, while 64 lesions produced by conventional projectiles fired from revolvers and semi-automatic pistols were assigned to the low-velocity projectile (LVP) group. The dimensions of the exit wounds of the HVP group were significantly higher when compared to the LVP group (95% CI 0.9886-2.423, p < 0.05). The HVP group showed significantly higher values for the EX/ENR when compared to the LVP group (95% CI 2.617-7.173, p < 0.05). The evaluation of the EX/ENR can be considered an adequate tool to assess the type of weapon involved and to roughly estimate the associated wounding mechanisms, which can guide both the physician in the management and treatment of the patients affected by GSW, and the forensic pathologist in crime investigation.

Indexed as

FirearmsForensic BallisticsWounds, GunshotHumansAssault riflesEntrance woundsEX/ENRExit woundsGSWGunshot woundsHandgunsHigh-velocity projectiles

Identifiers

PMID38146043
OpenAlexW4390235247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.