Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38145982›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Microbiological analysis and antibiotic selection strategy in neck abscesses among patients with diabetes mellitus.

Weili Kong, Xiaoyun Zhang, Mei Li, Hui Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weili KongDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoyun ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mei LiDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hui YangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. yh8806@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0039-4364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics, pathogen distribution, drug sensitivity, and antibiotic treatment strategies of patients with neck abscesses with or without diabetes.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 2194 patients who underwent neck abscess surgery at our hospital over the past 13 years. Patients were grouped as NA

resultsA total of 2194 patients with neck abscesses were included in this study, with 579 patients (26.43%) in the NA

conclusionNeck abscess patients with diabetes have distinct clinical features. Therefore, it is crucial to pay attention to these clinical features and manage them accordingly during the treatment process. Empirical antibiotic treatment should be tailored to individual patient groups. Sulfamethoxazole-methoxazole is recommended for neck abscess patients with diabetes, while ceftriaxone or moxifloxacin is recommended for those without diabetes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDiabetes MellitusAbscessCeftriaxoneHumansMoxifloxacinRetrospective StudiesSulfamethoxazoleAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftriaxoneMoxifloxacinSulfamethoxazoleAntibioticsDrug sensitivityNeck abscessPathogenic bacteria

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.