Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38145519›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2024

Integrated Time Nanosecond Pulse Irreversible Electroporation (INSPIRE): Assessment of Dose, Temperature, and Voltage on Experimental and Clinical Treatment Outcomes.

Christopher C Fesmire, Robert H Williamson, Ross A Petrella, Jacob D Kaufman, Nomi Topasna, Michael B Sano

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher C Fesmire
Robert H Williamson
Ross A Petrella
Jacob D Kaufman
Nomi Topasna
Michael B Sano
UNC/NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Academic-Industrial Partnership to Develop Clinical Tools for Algorithmic Irreversible Electroporation of Inoperable TumorsR01CA272550 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI SANO, MICHAEL BENJAMIN · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Development of an INSPIRE System for the Treatment of Inoperable Liver TumorsR01CA276232 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Michael Benjamin Sano · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272550NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study sought to investigate a novel strategy using temperature-controlled delivery of nanosecond pulsed electric fields as an alternative to the 50-100 microsecond pulses used for irreversible electroporation.

methodsINSPIRE treatments were carried out at two temperatures in 3D tumor models using doses between 0.001 s and 0.1 s. The resulting treatment zones were quantified using viability staining and lethal electric field intensities were determined numerically. Computational modeling was then used to determine parameters necessary for INSPIRE treatments to achieve equivalent treatment zones to clinical electroporation treatments and evaluate the potential for these treatments to induce deleterious thermal damage.

resultsLethal thresholds between 1109 and 709 V/cm were found for nominal 0.01 s treatments with pulses between 350 ns and 2000 ns at physiological temperatures. Further increases in dose resulted in significant decreases in lethal thresholds. Given these experimental results, treatment zones comparable to clinical electroporation are possible by increasing the dose and voltage used with nanosecond duration pulses. Temperature-controlled simulations indicate minimal thermal cell death while achieving equivalent treatment volumes to clinical electroporation.

conclusionNanosecond electrical pulses can achieve comparable outcomes to traditional electroporation provided sufficient electrical doses or voltages are applied. The use of temperature-controlled delivery may minimize thermal damage during treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: Intense muscle stimulation and the need for cardiac gating have limited irreversible electroporation. Nanosecond pulses can alleviate these challenges, but traditionally have produced significantly smaller treatment zones. This study suggests that larger ablation volumes may be possible with the INSPIRE approach and that future in vivo studies are warranted.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAnimalsCell Line, TumorComputer SimulationElectrochemotherapyHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsTemperatureTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38145519
PMCPMC11035095
OpenAlexW4390187536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.