Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38145480›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2023

Design of a Dyadic Digital Health Module for Chronic Disease Shared Care: Development Study.

Camila Benmessaoud, Kaylen J Pfisterer, Anjelica De Leon, Ashish Saragadam, Noor El-Dassouki, Karen G M Young, Raima Lohani, Ting Xiong, Quynh Pham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camila Benmessaoud *Centre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2367-6025
Kaylen J Pfisterer *Centre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8853-0705
Anjelica De LeonHealthcare Human Factors, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-8017
Ashish SaragadamCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1571-4922
Noor El-DassoukiCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-4068
Karen G M YoungCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5101-2568
Raima LohaniCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4301-3747
Ting XiongCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5060-0184
Quynh PhamCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-4181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic forced the spread of digital health tools to address limited clinical resources for chronic health management. It also illuminated a population of older patients requiring an informal caregiver (IC) to access this care due to accessibility, technological literacy, or English proficiency concerns. For patients with heart failure (HF), this rapid transition exacerbated the demand on ICs and pushed Canadians toward a dyadic care model where patients and ICs comanage care. Our previous work identified an opportunity to improve this dyadic HF experience through a shared model of dyadic digital health. We call this alternative model of care "Caretown for Medly," which empowers ICs to concurrently expand patients' self-care abilities while acknowledging ICs' eagerness to provide greater support.

objectiveWe present the systematic design and development of the Caretown for Medly dyadic management module. While HF is the outlined use case, we outline our design methodology and report on 6 core disease-invariant features applied to dyadic shared care for HF management. This work lays the foundation for future usability assessments of Caretown for Medly.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative, human-centered design study based on 25 semistructured interviews with self-identified ICs of loved ones living with HF. Interviews underwent thematic content analysis by 2 coders independently for themes derived deductively (eg, based on the interview guide) and inductively refined. To build the Caretown for Medly model, we (1) leveraged the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework to translate knowledge into action and (2) borrowed Google Sprint's ability to quickly "solve big problems and test new ideas," which has been effective in the medical and digital health spaces. Specifically, we blended these 2 concepts into a new framework called the "KTA Sprint."

resultsWe identified 6 core disease-invariant features to support ICs in care dyads to provide more effective care while capitalizing on dyadic care's synergistic benefits. Features were designed for customizability to suit the patient's condition, informed by stakeholder analysis, corroborated with literature, and vetted through user needs assessments. These features include (1) live reports to enhance data sharing and facilitate appropriate IC support, (2) care cards to enhance guidance on the caregiving role, (3) direct messaging to dissolve the disconnect across the circle of care, (4) medication wallet to improve guidance on managing complex medication regimens, (5) medical events timeline to improve and consolidate management and organization, and (6) caregiver resources to provide disease-specific education and support their self-care.

conclusionsThese disease-invariant features were designed to address ICs' needs in supporting their care partner. We anticipate that the implementation of these features will empower a shared model of care for chronic disease management through digital health and will improve outcomes for care dyads.

Indexed as

Digital HealthHeart FailureCanadaChronic DiseaseHumansNorth American PeoplePandemicsdigital therapeuticsdisease managementheart failureinformal caregiversmHealthmobile healthshared caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38145480
PMCPMC10775044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.