Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38145447›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2024

Boundary Spanning Methodological Approaches for Collaborative Moose Governance in Eeyou Istchee.

Nathan A Badry, Gwyneth A MacMillan, Eleanor R Stern, Manuelle Landry-Cuerrier, Gordon M Hickey, Murray M Humphries

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan A BadryDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. nathan.badry@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4208-7453
Gwyneth A MacMillanDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5199-4645
Eleanor R SternDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Manuelle Landry-CuerrierDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gordon M HickeyDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8169-5390
Murray M HumphriesDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural resource governance challenges are often highly complex, particularly in Indigenous contexts. These challenges involve numerous landscape-level interactions, spanning jurisdictional, disciplinary, social, and ecological boundaries. In Eeyou Istchee, the James Bay Cree Territory of northern Quebec, Canada, traditional livelihoods depend on wild food species like moose. However, these species are increasingly being impacted by forestry and other resource development projects. The complex relationships between moose, resource development, and Cree livelihoods can limit shared understandings and the ability of diverse actors to respond to these pressures. Contributing to this complexity are the different knowledge systems held by governance actors who, while not always aligned, have broadly shared species conservation and sustainable development goals. This paper presents fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) as a methodological approach used to help elicit and interpret the knowledge of land-users concerning the impacts of forest management on moose habitat in Eeyou Istchee. We explore the difficulties of weaving this knowledge together with the results of moose GPS collar analysis and the knowledges of scientists and government agencies. The ways in which participatory, relational mapping approaches can be applied in practice, and what they offer to pluralistic natural resource governance research more widely, are then addressed.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDeerAnimalsEcosystemForestryQuebecCo-managementIndigenous and local knowledgeKnowledge weavingOntological pluralismWildlife

Identifiers

PMID38145447
PMCPMC11208253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.