Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38145422›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Textbook outcome as indicator of surgical quality in a single Western center: results from 300 consecutive gastrectomies.

Marco Realis Luc, Stefano de Pascale, Filippo Ascari, Alessandro Michele Bonomi, Emilio Bertani, Chiara Alessandra Cella, Lorenzo Gervaso, Uberto Fumagalli Romario

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Textbook outcome in gastrectomy: useful metric or moving target? A scoping review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Realis LucDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. m.realisluc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9024-5061
Stefano de PascaleDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Filippo AscariDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro Michele BonomiDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Emilio BertaniDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Chiara Alessandra CellaDivision of Gastrointestinal and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo GervasoDivision of Gastrointestinal and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Uberto Fumagalli RomarioDigestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Textbook outcome (TO) has been proposed as a tool to evaluate surgical quality. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) adds chemotherapeutic compliance to TO. This study was conducted to analyze the TO and TOO of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at our center. Data from a prospective database of patients operated on for gastric adenocarcinoma between September 2018 and September 2022 were analyzed. Postoperative management followed Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines. The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit group defined TO as a multidimensional measure (10 items). TOO also considers guideline-accordant chemotherapeutic compliance. Three hundred patients underwent surgery during the study period (167 men, 133 women). One hundred seventy-six (58.7%) reached TO. Achieving TO was influenced by patients' comorbidities, calculated via the Charlson Comorbidity Score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.002) and surgery type (subtotal gastrectomy; p < 0.001), but not by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.057) or surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open; p = 0.208). The analysis of TOO included 213 patients. Of these, 71 (33%) underwent complete adequate systemic treatment. Compared with the non-TOO group, patients who achieved TOO had a lower median age (64 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001) and lower ASA score (p < 0.001) and more frequently underwent preoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Our results represent the experience of a single team at a high-volume Western institute. Patients' comorbidities and surgery type influenced whether TO was achieved. Conversely, younger age, lower ASA score and preoperative chemotherapy were associated with TOO.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaGastrectomyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEnhanced recovery after surgeryGastrectomyGastric cancerPostoperative complicationsTextbook

Identifiers

PMID38145422
OpenAlexW4390196541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.