Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38144499›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2023

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Utilization Trends in the United States: Evidence From 2012 to 2021 National Electronic Medical Records Network.

Abdulrahman Alsuhibani, Jonathan R Thompson, Patricia R Wigle, Jeff Jianfei Guo, Alex C Lin, Marepalli B Rao, Ana L Hincapie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair after Bariatric Surgery.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A population based study of bariatric surgery in Illinois.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abdulrahman AlsuhibaniFrom the Department of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia.
Jonathan R ThompsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Patricia R WigleDepartment of Health outcome, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Jeff Jianfei GuoDepartment of Health outcome, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Alex C LinDepartment of Health outcome, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Marepalli B RaoDepartment of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Ana L HincapieDepartment of Health outcome, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH.
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bariatric surgery has evolved over the past 2 decades yet assessing trends of bariatric surgery utilization in the growing eligible population is lacking. Aim: This study aimed to update the trends in bariatric surgery utilization, changes in types of procedures performed, and the characteristics of patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the United States, using real-world data. Method: This retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted using the TriNetX, a federated electronic medical records network from 2012 to 2021, for adult patients 18 years old or older who had bariatric surgery. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted to assess patients' demographics and characteristics. Annual secular trend analyses were conducted for the annual rate of bariatric surgery, and the specific procedural types and proportions of laparoscopic surgeries. Results: A steady increase in the number of procedures performed in the United States over the first 6 years of the study, a plateau for the following 2 years, and then a decline in 2020 and 2021 (during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic). The annual rate of bariatric surgery was lowest in 2012 at 59.2 and highest in 2018 at 79.6 surgeries per 100,000 adults. During the study period, 96.2% to 98.8% of procedures performed annually were conducted laparoscopically as opposed to the open technique. Beginning in 2012, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure fell to represent only 17.1% of cases in 2018, along with a sharp decline in the adjustable gastric band (AGB) procedure, replaced by a sharp increase in the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedure to represent over 74% of cases in 2018. Conclusions: Bariatric surgery utilization in the United States showed a moderate decline in the number of RYGB procedures, which was offset by a substantial increase in the number of SG procedures and a precipitous drop in the annual number of AGB procedures.

Indexed as

bariatric surgery procedure trendsmetabolic and bariatric surgeryobesityRoux-en-Y gastric bypasssleeve gastrectomytrendsutilization

Identifiers

PMID38144499
PMCPMC10735086
OpenAlexW4389305446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.