Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38144237›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2023

Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax, and Context.

Alexandre Pasquiou, Yair Lakretz, Bertrand Thirion, Christophe Pallier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Crafting Interpretable Embeddings for Language Neuroscience by Asking LLMs Questions.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre PasquiouCognitive Neuroimaging Unit (UNICOG), NeuroSpin, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) and French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Frédéric Joliot Life Sciences Institute, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7966-8083
Yair LakretzCognitive Neuroimaging Unit (UNICOG), NeuroSpin, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) and French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Frédéric Joliot Life Sciences Institute, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Bertrand ThirionModels and Inference for Neuroimaging Data (MIND), NeuroSpin, French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Inria Saclay, Frédéric Joliot Life Sciences Institute, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Christophe PallierCognitive Neuroimaging Unit (UNICOG), NeuroSpin, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) and French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Frédéric Joliot Life Sciences Institute, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Inserm · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question in neurolinguistics concerns the brain regions involved in syntactic and semantic processing during speech comprehension, both at the lexical (word processing) and supra-lexical levels (sentence and discourse processing). To what extent are these regions separated or intertwined? To address this question, we introduce a novel approach exploiting neural language models to generate high-dimensional feature sets that separately encode semantic and syntactic information. More precisely, we train a lexical language model, GloVe, and a supra-lexical language model, GPT-2, on a text corpus from which we selectively removed either syntactic or semantic information. We then assess to what extent the features derived from these information-restricted models are still able to predict the fMRI time courses of humans listening to naturalistic text. Furthermore, to determine the windows of integration of brain regions involved in supra-lexical processing, we manipulate the size of contextual information provided to GPT-2. The analyses show that, while most brain regions involved in language comprehension are sensitive to both syntactic and semantic features, the relative magnitudes of these effects vary across these regions. Moreover, regions that are best fitted by semantic or syntactic features are more spatially dissociated in the left hemisphere than in the right one, and the right hemisphere shows sensitivity to longer contexts than the left. The novelty of our approach lies in the ability to control for the information encoded in the models' embeddings by manipulating the training set. These "information-restricted" models complement previous studies that used language models to probe the neural bases of language, and shed new light on its spatial organization.

Indexed as

contextencoding modelsfMRILLMsemanticssyntax

Identifiers

PMID38144237
PMCPMC10745090
OpenAlexW4387489715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.