Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38143247›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2024

Olfactory immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

Sebastian A Wellford, E Ashley Moseman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory immunity: defending the neural-mucosal barrier.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Combination antiviral and anti-inflammatory therapy mitigates persistent neurological deficits in mice post SARS-CoV-2 infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Antiviral responses in peripheral and brain neurons.Current opinion in immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian A WellfordDepartment of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
E Ashley MosemanDepartment of Integrative Immunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. ashley.moseman@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-6116
Duke University · US

Funding

Basic Immunology Training ProgramT32AI052077 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRANGEL, MICHAEL S · 2002 to 2024
$4.2M
Treatment of Primary Amoebic Meningoencephalitis via Modulation of Antibody Effector FunctionsR01NS121067 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOSEMAN, E. ASHLEY · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
T cell/astrocyte fusions as a novel form of trained immunity to infectionR21NS133561 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOSEMAN, E. ASHLEY · 2023 to 2024
$434k
Defining the molecular and anatomical basis of the blood-olfactory barrier (BOB)R21DC021260 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOSEMAN, E. ASHLEY · 2023 to 2023
$434k
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052077NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC021260NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121067NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS133561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous pathogens can infect the olfactory tract, yet the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has strongly emphasized the importance of the olfactory mucosa as an immune barrier. Situated in the nasal passages, the olfactory mucosa is directly exposed to the environment to sense airborne odorants; however, this also means it can serve as a direct route of entry from the outside world into the brain. As a result, olfactotropic infections can have serious consequences, including dysfunction of the olfactory system, CNS invasion, dissemination to the lower respiratory tract, and transmission between individuals. Recent research has shown that a distinctive immune response is needed to protect this neuronal and mucosal tissue. A better understanding of innate, adaptive, and structural immune barriers in the olfactory mucosa is needed to develop effective therapeutics and vaccines against olfactotropic microbes such as SARS-CoV-2. Here, we summarize the ramifications of SARS-CoV-2 infection of the olfactory mucosa, review the subsequent immune response, and discuss important areas of future research for olfactory immunity to infectious disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2BrainHumansImmunityOlfactory MucosaInfectious DiseaseMucosal immunologyNeuroimmunologySars-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38143247
PMCPMC10806031
OpenAlexW4390192728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.