Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38142923›Full record

ArticleBiological psychology2024

Socioeconomic status moderates neural markers of cognitive reappraisal across preschool.

Jennifer L Kling, Rebecca J Brooker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jennifer L KlingDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, USA. Electronic address: klingjl@tamu.edu.
Rebecca J BrookerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI BRIAN P BOTHNER · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Translational Biomarkers CoreP20GM104417 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI ADAMS, ALEXANDRA K. · 2014 to 2023
$23.1M
Biological Systems as Mediators of Transactional Influences on Anxiety Risk in the Mother-Child Dyad During Infancy and will to NIMHR01MH113669 · NIMH · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BROOKER, REBECCA, KIEL, ELIZABETH JAYNE · 2020 to 2025
$3.3M
Convergent Markers of Risk for Psychopathology in Infants and ToddlersK01MH100240 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BROOKER, REBECCA · 2013 to 2016
$531k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104417NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH100240NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) is critical for children's healthy socio-emotional development, in part through its modulation of negative emotions that might otherwise place children at risk for psychopathology. The cognitive ER strategy of reappraisal appears to be particularly protective against the development of symptoms of anxiety and depression during childhood. Despite widespread acceptance of the benefits of reappraisal for children's long-term affective function, little is known about the developmental mechanisms that support emerging reappraisal in young children. Proximal mechanisms supporting reappraisal include biological processes; the modulation of reactivity to negative emotional stimuli is visible at the neural level through the Late Positive Potential (LPP). Influences on the developmental course of mechanisms like the LPP almost certainly include contextual factors, including quality of the environment, which have been largely ignored in work to date. The present study included a test of early (age 3-4) socioeconomic status (SES) as a moderator of children's reappraisal, evidenced by differences in the LPP to passive view and reappraisal conditions, at age 5. Results supported the presence of moderation. Reappraisal was visible as differences in LPP across conditions at high, but not low, levels of SES. Findings offer a foundation for delineating the development of reappraisal and understanding contexts that may promote preschoolers' reappraisal. Results also contribute to the delineation of the role of early psychophysiological markers in affective function and early risk for psychopathology.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsChildChild, PreschoolCognitionEmotionsHumansSocial ClassChildrenEmotion regulationReappraisal, ERPs, late positive potential

Identifiers

PMID38142923
PMCPMC11149893
OpenAlexW4390116360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.