Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38142646›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2024

Defining the boundaries: challenges and advances in identifying cells in microscopy images.

Nodar Gogoberidze, Beth A Cimini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Piximi - An Images to Discovery web tool for bioimages and beyond.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nodar GogoberidzeImaging Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Beth A CiminiImaging Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. Electronic address: bcimini@broadinstitute.org.

Funding

Center for Open Bioimage AnalysisP41GM135019 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARPENTER, ANNE E. · 2020 to 2024
$6.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM135019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation, or the outlining of objects within images, is a critical step in the measurement and analysis of cells within microscopy images. While improvements continue to be made in tools that rely on classical methods for segmentation, deep learning-based tools increasingly dominate advances in the technology. Specialist models such as Cellpose continue to improve in accuracy and user-friendliness, and segmentation challenges such as the Multi-Modality Cell Segmentation Challenge continue to push innovation in accuracy across widely varying test data as well as efficiency and usability. Increased attention on documentation, sharing, and evaluation standards is leading to increased user-friendliness and acceleration toward the goal of a truly universal method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMicroscopyImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID38142646
PMCPMC11170924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.