ArticlePsychiatry research2024
The association between suspected long-COVID and stimulant prescribing in the United States.
Article in Psychiatry research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of prescription stimulant initiation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based time-series analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Functional Limitations and Illness-Related Absenteeism among School-Aged Children with and without Long COVID, United States, 2022-2023.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study sought to determine the association between suspected long-COVID and receipt of a stimulant prescription among persons diagnosed with COVID-19 and to describe clinical and demographic factors associated with receiving a stimulant prescription.
methodsUS patients 18 and older who had a COVID-19 diagnosis or a positive COVID-19 PCR test from April 1st, 2020 through December 21st, 2022 recorded in a national electronic health record data set obtained from TriNetX were assessed. Comparison subjects were propensity score matched on baseline covariates to those with a symptom of or diagnosis of long-COVID. A Cox Proportional Hazards models was used to estimate the influence of long-COVID on stimulant prescription receipt.
resultsThose with long-COVID (n = 65,329) were twice as likely to be prescribed a stimulant as persons with only acute COVID-19 (n = 189,438, HR=2.162; 1.929-2.423). Among persons with long-COVID, persons with new onset ADHD (HR=7.196; 5.749- 9.007), opioid-related disorders (HR=2.140; 1.264-3.621) and mood disorders (HR=1.649; 1.336-2.035) were more likely to be prescribed a stimulant.
conclusionFurther research describing the risks associated with increased stimulant use among persons with long-COVID is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.