Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38142046›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2024

Who Responds to an Adaptive Intervention for Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa Being Treated With Family-Based Treatment? Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

James D Lock, Daniel Le Grange, Cara Bohon, Brittany Matheson, Booil Jo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03097874 (Confirming the Efficacy/Mechanism of an Adaptive Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03097874 nacompletednot on this map

Confirming the Efficacy/Mechanism of an Adaptive Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled130ConditionsEating Disorder, Anorexia, Anorexia Nervosa, Anorexia in AdolescenceArmsFamily Based Treatment, Family Based Treatment + Intensive Parental Coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Recent developments in treatments for eating disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-Eating Disorder Across the Lifespan.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James D LockStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: jimlock@stanford.edu.
Daniel Le GrangeUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; University of Chicago (Emeritus), Chicago, Illinois.
Cara BohonStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Brittany MathesonStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Booil JoStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Confirming the Efficacy/Mechanism of an Adaptive Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia NervosaR01MH110538 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LOCK, JAMES D · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious psychiatric disorder with high morbidity and mortality. The current evidence supports the use of family-based treatment (FBT), but recovery rates are only about 40%. Improving treatment outcomes among adolescents with AN will save lives, improve health, and prevent chronicity. This study examined the relative efficacy of adding intensive parental coaching (IPC) to standard FBT for patients who do not respond by weight gain of 2.4 kg by session 4, a clinical predictor of outcome at the end of treatment, to improve remission rates (>94% of expected mean body mass index).

methodThe study recruited 107 participants and their families from across the United States; 69 participants failed to respond early and were randomly assigned to continue with standard FBT or to receive 3 sessions of IPC. Participants were adolescents (ages 12-18) meeting DSM-5 criteria for AN; 6.5% were male, and 11% were Hispanic.

resultsMain outcomes were mean body mass index >94% expected for age, height, and sex. Secondary outcomes included change in eating-related cognitions. Adding IPC to early nonresponders did not improve outcomes except for participants whose parents demonstrated low parental self-efficacy at baseline (moderator). Early weight gain of 2.4 kg by session 4 was replicated as a predictor of end of treatment remission.

conclusionParental self-efficacy moderates IPC as an adaptive treatment for adolescents with AN. Baseline parental self-efficacy assessment can be used to identify families most likely to benefit from adding IPC to FBT. Future studies should consider earlier interventions to improve early response rates. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Anorexia nervosa is a serious psychiatric disorder. While family-based treatment (FBT) has the largest evidence base for adolescents with anorexia, recovery rates are only about 40%. This study investigated the addition of 3 sessions of intensive parental coaching intervention (IPC) to FBT among youth with anorexia who did not gain adequate weight early in treatment, a predictor of recovery by the end of treatment. Youth with inadequate weight gain were randomized to either receive FBT with IPC or FBT as usual. Overall, adding IPC did not improve outcomes among youth with anorexia. However among those whose parents demonstrated low parental self-efficacy at baseline, youth who received FBT with IPC had higher remission rates than youth who received FBT alone. CLINICAL GUIDANCE: Intensive parental coaching shows promise for improving outcomes among youth with anorexia whose parents report low parental self-efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Adaptive Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT03097874.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaFamily TherapyAdolescentBody Mass IndexChildFemaleHumansMaleMentoringParentsTreatment OutcomeWeight Gainadolescentsanorexia nervosaeating disordersfamily-based treatmentrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID38142046
PMCPMC11144105
OpenAlexW4390031176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.