Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38141658›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2024

The implementation of tunnel handling in a mouse breeding facility revealed strain-specific behavioural responses.

Katharina Hohlbaum, Roswitha Merle, Ramona Warnke, Stefan Nagel-Riedasch, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Kristina Ullmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina HohlbaumGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6681-9367
Roswitha MerleInstitute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
Ramona WarnkeResearch Facilities for Experimental Medicine (FEM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Stefan Nagel-RiedaschResearch Facilities for Experimental Medicine (FEM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8205-4891
Christa Thöne-ReinekeScience of Intelligence, Research Cluster of Excellence, Berlin, Germany.
Kristina UllmannNuvisan ICB GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DENuvisan (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a step towards implementing non-aversive handling techniques at a big mouse breeding facility in Germany, tunnel handling was introduced in a breeding unit comprising three inbred mouse strains. To assess whether tunnel handling would be feasible for the animal technicians in their everyday work and beneficial for the mice when being handled during weekly cage change only, the behaviour of tunnel- and tail-handled animals of both sexes was examined before, during and after the handling events over a period of nine weeks. Moreover, the time expenditure was compared between both handling techniques. It was possible to use the tunnel in all three mouse strains. However, the impact of the handling techniques on the behavioural parameters investigated in the present study were strain-specific. All behavioural parameters suggested that NZW mice benefited the most from tunnel handling. The results obtained from Hello Kitty and WNK mice were ambiguous, which may suggest that a brief handling session during the cage clean may have not been sufficient to habituate them to the process of handling. It took the animal technicians approximately 3 seconds longer per mouse when using a tunnel. The strain-specific results should encourage researchers to share their experiences with non-aversive handling techniques in different mouse strains, for example, along with their research articles.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBehavior, AnimalAnimalsAnimal WelfareFemaleGermanyHandling, PsychologicalMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsSpecies Specificity3Rsanimal facilitiesethics and welfarehandling techniquesrefinementtechniqueswelfare

Identifiers

PMID38141658
PMCPMC11633062
OpenAlexW4390154754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.