Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38141615›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2024

Neurophysiological and behavioral synchronization in group-living and sleeping mice.

Maria I Sotelo, Chelsea Markunas, Tyler Kudlak, Chani Kohtz, Alexei L Vyssotski, Gideon Rothschild, Ada Eban-Rothschild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phasic Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens Influences REM Sleep Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. At the Intersection of Pain and Sleep: a Roadmap for Preclinical Pain Research.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria I SoteloDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Chelsea MarkunasDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Tyler KudlakDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Chani KohtzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Alexei L VyssotskiInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zürich, Zürich 8057, Switzerland.
Gideon RothschildDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Kresge Hearing Research Institute and Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Ada Eban-RothschildDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: adae@umich.edu.

Funding

The neural mechanisms and mnemonic consequences of sound processing during sleepR01NS129874 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ada Eban-Rothschild, Gideon Rothschild · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
The functions of dopamine signaling during sleep in memoryR01NS131821 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ada Eban-Rothschild, Gideon Rothschild · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129874NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS131821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions profoundly influence animal development, physiology, and behavior. Yet, how sleep-a central behavioral and neurophysiological process-is modulated by social interactions is poorly understood. Here, we characterized sleep behavior and neurophysiology in freely moving and co-living mice under different social conditions. We utilized wireless neurophysiological devices to simultaneously record multiple individuals within a group for 24 h, alongside video acquisition. We first demonstrated that mice seek physical contact before sleep initiation and sleep while in close proximity to each other (hereafter, "huddling"). To determine whether huddling during sleep is a motivated behavior, we devised a novel behavioral apparatus allowing mice to choose whether to sleep in close proximity to a conspecific or in solitude, under different environmental conditions. We also applied a deep-learning-based approach to classify huddling behavior. We demonstrate that mice are willing to forgo their preferred sleep location, even under thermoneutral conditions, to gain access to social contact during sleep. This strongly suggests that the motivation for prolonged physical contact-which we term somatolonging-drives huddling behavior. We then characterized sleep architecture under different social conditions and uncovered a social-dependent modulation of sleep. We also revealed coordination in multiple neurophysiological features among co-sleeping individuals, including in the timing of falling asleep and waking up and non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) intensity. Notably, the timing of rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) was synchronized among co-sleeping male siblings but not co-sleeping female or unfamiliar mice. Our findings provide novel insights into the motivation for physical contact and the extent of social-dependent plasticity in sleep.

Indexed as

SleepSleep, REMAnimalsElectroencephalographyFemaleMaleMiceWakefulnesshuddling behaviorimmersive social interactions assayneurophysiological synchronizationNREM sleeppre-sleep behaviorREM sleepsocial contactsomatolongingwireless technology

Identifiers

PMID38141615
PMCPMC10843607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.