ArticleTranslational oncology2024
A comprehensive radiopathological nomogram for the prediction of pathological staging in gastric cancer using CT-derived and WSI-based features.
Article in Translational oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: a systematic review of machine learning and deep learning applications.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Conventional MRI-Based Semantic Features for Differentiation of Pediatric Medulloblastoma and Ependymoma in the Fourth Ventricle: Insights From a Multi-Center Retrospective Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Development of a Prediction Model for Progression Risk in High-Grade Gliomas Based on Habitat Radiomics and Pathomics.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- A radiomics nomogram utilizing T2-weighted MRI for accurate diagnosis of rectocele.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Recent advances, comparative performance, and data requirements of artificial intelligence-assisted technologies for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A novel deep learning radiopathomics model for predicting carcinogenesis promotor cyclooxygenase-2 expression in common bile duct in children with pancreaticobiliary maljunction: a multicenter study.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Nanomaterials in gastric cancer: pioneering precision medicine for diagnosis, therapy, and prevention.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in advanced gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of applications in precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Enhanced prediction of gene mutation and risk stratification in non-small-cell lung cancer through dual-pathway fusion of radiomics and pathomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based classification of breast cancer molecular subtypes from H&E whole-slide images.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Predicting tumor invasion depth in gastric cancer: developing and validating multivariate models incorporating preoperative IVIM-DWI parameters and MRI morphological characteristics.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate an innovative radiopathomics model that combines radiomics and pathomics features to effectively differentiate between stages I-II and stage III gastric cancer (pathological staging).
methodsOur study included 200 patients with well-defined stages of gastric cancer divided into a training cohort (n = 140) and a test cohort (n = 60). Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced CT images using PyRadiomics, while pathomics features were obtained from whole slide images of pathological specimens through a fine-tuned deep learning model (ResNet-18). After rigorous feature dimensionality reduction and selection, we constructed radiomics models (SVM_rad, LR_rad, and MLP_rad) and pathomics models (SVM_path, LR_path, and MLP_path) utilizing support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms. The optimal radiomics and pathomics models were chosen based on comprehensive evaluation criteria such as ROC curves, Hosmer‒Lemeshow tests, and calibration curve tests. Feature patterns extracted from the best-performing radiomics model (MLP_rad) and pathomics model (SVM_rad) were integrated to create a powerful radiopathomics nomogram.
resultsFrom a pool of 1834 radiomics features extracted from CT images, 14 were selected to construct radiomics models. Among these, the MLP_rad model exhibited the most robust predictive performance (AUC, training cohort: 0.843; test cohort: 0.797). Likewise, 10 pathomics features were chosen from 512 extracted from whole slide images to build pathomics models, with the SVM_path model demonstrating the highest predictive efficiency (AUC, training cohort: 0.937; test cohort: 0.792). The combined radiopathomics nomogram model exhibited optimal discriminative ability (AUC, training cohort: 0.951; test cohort: 0.837), as confirmed by decision curve analysis (DCA), which indicated superior clinical effectiveness.
conclusionThis study presents a cutting-edge radiopathomics nomogram model designed to predict pathological staging in gastric cancer, distinguishing between stages I-II and stage III. Our research leverages preoperative CT images and histopathological slides to forecast gastric cancer staging accurately, potentially facilitating the estimation of staging before radical gastric cancer surgery in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.