Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38141191›Full record

ReviewCurrent drug discovery technologies2024

Articulate Chemotherapeutic Strategies for the Development of Effective Drugs against a Fatal Disease, Visceral Leishmaniasis.

Awanish Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current drug discovery technologies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Awanish KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, 492010 (CG), India.ORCID 0000-0001-8735-479X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) control relies mainly on chemotherapy in the absence of no effective vaccines. However, available anti-VL drugs are limited in number, having toxicity issues, adverse reactions, low efficacy, and resistance observed against antileishmanial. A significant decrease in efficacy (~tenfold increase in dosage and duration) was reported against the usual treatment with Pentavalent antimonials (the most recommended antileishmanial drug discovered 90 years ago). Amphotericin B is the second line of treatment but limits wider use due to its high cost. Pentamidine is another anti-VL drug, but its therapeutic efficacy has decreased significantly in different areas. These conventional therapeutics for VL have become almost outdated due to a significant increase in therapeutic failure in terms of percentage. Due to this, the search for an effective future anti-VL drug spans several decades, and now it is in high demand in the current situation. Some conventional therapeutics are modified, but they are also not satisfactory. Therefore, this article aimed to discuss conventional and modified therapeutics while emphasizing innovative chemotherapeutic measures against VL that could speed up the slow pace of antileishmanial drugs and overcome the drug resistance problem in the future.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsLeishmaniasis, VisceralAnimalsDrug DevelopmentDrug ResistanceHumansAntiprotozoal Agentscurrent arsenalsfetal disease.future chemotherapeutic strategiesmodified therapynew antileishmanialsVisceral leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID38141191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.